Credits Earned (2024) Crédits obtenus

Redeem Prepaid Membership

Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#96 Calcitonin withdrawal: Now what for acute vertebral fractures?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
Is there any medication (other than traditional analgesia) that works for bone pain resulting from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF)?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Calcitonin had weak evidence of moderate effectiveness for acute OVCF pain but was withdrawn over cancer risks. Although the evidence is very poor, bisphosphonates appear to have similar effect on acute pain reduction and are useful in secondary fracture prevention



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
As of October 1, 2013, Synthetic Calcitonin (Salmon) nasal spray will be withdrawn from the Canadian Market.1 Despite being on the market since 1975 (in the U.S.), only recently has a meta-analysis of 17 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) concluded that calcitonin is associated with an increased risk of overall malignancy with a Number Needed to Harm (NNH) of 63.2
  • A systematic review of five RCTs (246 patients) demonstrated that calcitonin was effective in reduction of OVCF pain compared to placebo with a mean difference (MD) of 3.4 on a 10 point visual analogue scale (VAS) at one week.3
  • Two small studies examining bisphosphonates for pain.
    • One direct comparison RCT: 27 women, IV pamidronate or IV calcitonin x 1 dose4
      • Day 4: both groups had statistically significant improvement in pain on VAS scale:
        • • Pamidronate ~1.1 (baseline 5.9)
        • • Calcitonin ~2.3 (baseline 6.3)
      • ▪ Day 30: Pamidronate ~2.3cm, Calcitonin ~3.1cm
        • No statistically significant difference in pain scores, functional disability or analgesic use
    • o RCT 32 women, IV pamidronate versus placebo (baseline ~7.6)5
      • After one week, those taking pamidronate had significantly decreased pain with standing (MD ~2.3) but not in supine pain (MD ~1.1)
Context:
  • The minimum clinically significant change in patient’s pain severity measured with a 10-cm VAS is 1.3 cm.6
  • • Approximately 60% of patients with OVCF who are conservatively managed will have adequate resolution of pain within three months.7
  • For secondary prevention, bisphosphonates are beneficial in prevention of vertebral (NNT 9-60) and non-vertebral fractures (NNT 20-68).8
  • Bisphosphonates (oral and IV) have also demonstrated benefit in metastatic bone pain.9
  • There is no evidence of superiority of one bisphosphonate over another in acute pain management.
updated by evan sehn on march 8 2017


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#378 Tony Romo-sozumab: Winning touchdown in osteoporosis or interception for the loss?

What is the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#377 How to slow the flow IV: Combined oral contraceptives

In premenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding due to benign etiology, do combined oral contraceptives (COC) improve patient outcomes?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#376 Testosterone supplementation for cis-gender men: Let’s (andro-)pause for a moment (Update)

What are the benefits and harms of testosterone supplementation in healthy cis-gender men or those with age-related low testosterone?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Christina Korownyk MD CCFP
  • David Ross MD CCFP

1. Recalls and safety alerts. Website. Health Canada. Available from: http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2013/34783a-eng.php

2. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Dr ugs/ReproductiveHealthDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM343748.pdf

3. Knopp-Sihota JA, Newburn-Cook CV, Homik J. Osteoporosis Int. 2012; 23(1):17-38.

4. Laroche M, Cantogrel S, Jamard B, Clin Rheumatol. 2006; 25(5):683-6.

5. Armingeat T, Brondino R, Pham T, et al. Osteoporos Int. 2006; 17:1659-65.

6. Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr; 27(4):485-9.

7. Venmans A, Klazen CA, Lohle PN, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33:519-21.

8. McClung M, Harris ST, Miller PD, et al. Am J Med. 2013; 126(1):13-20.

9. Wong R, Wiffen PJ. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; (2):CD002068.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.

Most recent review: 08/03/2017

By: Evan Sehn BSc Pharm PharmD Candidate

Comments:

Evidence Updated: None; Bottom Line: Unchanged.

Learning at a glance
Yearly credits
Acquired ()
Your content by topic
Cardiology Dermatology Emergency
My Bookmarks