#400 Vitamin D and Mortality-Don’t bet your life on it!
CLINICAL QUESTION
Does vitamin D supplementation reduce mortality, cardiovascular disease, or cancer in adults?
BOTTOM LINE
The 400th Tool for Practice is here! We sincerely thank our authors, peer reviewers, and especially our readers: your contributions and support have made reaching this milestone possible!
Vitamin D supplementation does not reduce all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, or cancer incidence. Effects on cancer mortality are inconsistent with most systematic reviews and the largest randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing no effect.
Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits
Join NowAlready a CFPCLearn Member? Log in
EVIDENCE
- 11 systematic reviews1-11 from the last 3 years, 12-80 RCTs, 70,278-182,804 patients. Adults (most RCTs average age >50, some “healthy” populations, some including chronic diseases), vitamin D (varying doses, example 400 international units (IU) daily to 100,000 IU monthly) compared to placebo/no treatment. Follow-up ~5 years (range 7 months-12 years).
- All-cause mortality :1-5
- Four systematic reviews:1-4 no difference from placebo. One other5 had an Odds Ratio 0.95 (95%CI 0.93-0.99) (event rates not reported). Insufficient details provided to evaluate why results differ.
- Cardiovascular disease (RCTs included patients with/without cardiovascular disease):
- Cardiovascular events:1-3,9-11 No difference.
- Cardiovascular mortality:3,5,9-11 No difference.
- Cancer (RCTs included patients with/without cancer):
- Cancer Incidence:1,2,4,9,10 No difference.
- Cancer mortality:1,4,9-11 Inconsistent results:
- Four systematic reviews:1,4,9,11 No difference. One systematic review10 not including largest RCT of bolus-dosing found difference, but event rates not provided, and largest RCTs showed no effect.
- Subgroup analysis of daily versus bolus-dosing:4,9,10 No difference.
- Four systematic reviews:1,4,9,11 No difference. One systematic review10 not including largest RCT of bolus-dosing found difference, but event rates not provided, and largest RCTs showed no effect.
- Adverse events: No difference.
- Limitations: Some systematic reviews missing metagraphs, heterogeneous populations, different dosages (daily versus boluses; various doses).
CONTEXT
- Guideline12 suggests supplementation in those >75 years old based on a non-statistically different sub-group analysis.2
- In the general population and in those with low vitamin D levels, vitamin D does not prevent fractures13 or respiratory infections.14 High-dose bolus vitamin D may increase fracture risk.15
- Other interventions may have a larger impact on cancer mortality. Exercise interventions of 2-32 weeks with observational follow-up of 1-96 months reduce cancer mortality from 22% to 14% and cancer recurrence from 14% to 7%.16
Latest Tools for Practice
#403 A Whiff of Prevention: Treating Male Partners to Reduce Bacterial Vaginosis Recurrence
Does treating male sexual partners of females undergoing treatment for bacterial vaginosis infection decrease recurrence?
#402 Nipple Confusion or Nonsense? Pacifiers and Breastfeeding Duration
In term infants, does restricting early use of pacifiers result in higher rates of breastfeeding up to 6 months of age?
#401 Vape Expectations: Are electronic cigarettes the real deal for smoking cessation? (Update)
Are nicotine-containing e-cigarettes more effective than other available options for smoking cessation?
Maybe the authors should consider if it’s the source vitamin D that matter, ie. sunshine