#122 Lipoproteins: The risk of (over)interpreting these risk factors?
Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits
Join NowAlready a CFPCLearn Member? Log in
- Are lipoproteins associated with CVD? Yes.
- Five systematic reviews1-5 with 23-40 studies: All lipoproteins are associated with CVD.
- Example: Higher apolipoprotein B, relative risk 1.99 (1.65-2.39).1
- Five systematic reviews1-5 with 23-40 studies: All lipoproteins are associated with CVD.
- Do lipoproteins add to risk prediction models? No.
- Systematic review6 with 37 studies. Taking standard risk prediction tools and:
- Replacing total cholesterol/HDL with any lipoprotein made prediction worse.
- Adding any lipoprotein improved overall risk prediction by ≤0.0018 (from 0.7244 area-under-the-curve), a clinically meaningless value.
- For comparison, leukocyte count improves prediction by 0.0036.7
- Reclassification: Limiting lipoprotein testing to patients at moderate (10%-<20%) 10-year CVD risk and treating those reclassified as high risk would require testing 801-4,541 to prevent one CVD event in 10 years.6
- Systematic review6 with 37 studies. Taking standard risk prediction tools and:
- Do changes in lipoproteins predict benefit? No.
- One randomized controlled trial of 15,828 CVD patients demonstrated that using darapladib (lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 inhibitor) did not change CVD outcomes.8
- Two systematic reviews9,10 with 8-25 studies: Apolipoprotein B changes did not predict benefit better than LDL and maybe worse than non-HDL cholesterol.
- Regardless, monitoring is not required to predict statin benefit.
- There are ~300 CVD risk factors.11
- Many drugs (ezetimibe,12 torcetrapib,13 niacin,14 aleglitazar,15 rosiglitazone,16 darapladib,8 etc.) improve biomarkers but do not change or worsen CVD.
- 2012 Canadian guidelines recommend apolipoprotein B as an alternate biomarker for CVD risk and for treatment target.17 New US Guidelines do not.18