Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#17 X-rays for Non-specific Low Back Pain: A non-specific pain?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
In patients with lower back pain, do lumbar X-rays modify any patient outcome?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
In non-specific low back pain, X-rays do nothing to improve outcomes and may worsen some (such as pain).



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
A recent meta-analysis, and a closer look at the best randomized controlled trial (RCT), help us here. 
  • Meta-analysis1: 6 trials (1804 patients): MRI/CT 2 trials & X-ray 4 trials.  0-44% had sciatica 
    • Relatively good quality but lots of heterogeneity (except pain). 
    • Short term & long-term outcomes of pain, function, quality of life, mental health and patient satisfaction did not differ significantly 
      • Pain at 3 months borderline worse with x-ray (Standard Mean Difference 0.19, CI -0.01 to 0.39) 
  • RCT,2 UK, 421 general practice patients with low-back pain ≥ 6 weeks  
    • At 3 months statistically significant difference in: 
      • Proportion of patients still in pain: 74% X-ray vs 65%, Number needed to harm (NNH) 12 
      • Proportion of patients requiring follow-up doctor visit: 53% X-ray vs 30%, NNH 5 
      • Self rated health status: 5% worse in X-ray group.   
  • After 6 more months, borderline but not statistically significant 
  • However, ≥ 80% of both groups want X-rays.  
    • Those with x-rays were more satisfied with the visit    
    • X-rays findings did not correlate to clinical findings
Context 
  • Early MRI and CT also do not improve outcomes.1 
  • A RCT comparing MRI directly to back X-ray also found no difference.3   
  • Three guidelines from Alberta4, Europe5 and US6 all discourage routine back x-rays for non-specific low back pain. 
  • Non-specific low back pain is low back pain without recognizable or known specific pathology (e.g. infection, tumour, osteoporosis, ankylosing spondylitis, fracture, inflammatory process, radicular syndrome or cauda equina syndrome).4-6  
  • These study results/recommendations do not apply to back pain with suspicion of specific pathology (such as progressive neurologic changes or infection) 
  • These patients warrant further investigation 
updated july 13, 2016 by ricky


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#363 Making a difference in indifference? Medications for apathy in dementia

In patients with dementia, how safe and effective are stimulants, antidepressants, and antipsychotics for treating apathy?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#362 Facing the Evidence in Acne, Part I: Oral contraceptives and spironolactone in females

How effective are combined oral contraceptives (COC) and spironolactone for treating acne of at least mild-moderate severity in females?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#361 Preventing RSV Infections in Infants

How safe and effective are monoclonal antibodies to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections in infants?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • G. Michael Allan MD CCFP
  • G. Richard Spooner MD CCFP

1. Chou R, Fu R, Carrino JA, et al. Lancet 2009; 373: 463–72.

2. Kendrick D, Fielding K, Bentley E, et al. BMJ. 2001 Feb 17;322:400-5.

3. Jarvik JG, Hollingworth W, Martin B, et al. JAMA 2003;289:2810–8.

4. http://www.topalbertadoctors.org/cpgs/885801. Accessed 27-AUG-2013.

5. http://www.kovacs.org/descargas/EuropeanGuidelinesfortheManagementofAcute NonspecificLowBackPain(54paginas).pdf Accessed 27-AUG-2013.

6. Chou R, Qaseen A, Snow V, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:478-491.

7. Chou R, Qaseem A, Owens DK, et al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:181-9.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.