#195 Shooting the Breeze on Supervised Injection Sites
CLINICAL QUESTION
Do supervised injection sites (SIS) reduce mortality, hospitalizations, ambulance calls, or disease transmission?
BOTTOM LINE
Best evidence from cohort or modeling studies suggest that SIS are associated with lower overdose mortality (88 fewer overdose deaths/100,000 person years), 67% fewer ambulance calls for treating overdoses and a decrease in HIV infections. Effects on hospitalizations are unknown.
Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits
Join NowAlready a CFPCLearn Member? Log in
EVIDENCE
- Mortality:
- High quality cohort study examining overdose mortality before and after Vancouver SIS opening.1
- Of persons living within 500m of SIS (70% of SIS users):
- Overdose deaths decreased from 253 to 165/100,000 person years (PYs); absolute risk difference: 88 deaths/100,000 PYs.
- SIS one overdose death prevented annually for every 1,137 users.
- Rest of city: No change in mortality.
- Of persons living within 500m of SIS (70% of SIS users):
- High quality cohort study examining overdose mortality before and after Vancouver SIS opening.1
- Hospitalizations:
- Pre-SIS: 35% of 598 Vancouver intravenous drug users (IVDUs) admitted over three year period.2
- 15% for skin infections.
- Post-SIS: Of 1,083 SIS users over four years:3
- 9% admitted with cutaneous injection-related infections (including osteomyelitis, endocarditis).
- While SIS nurse ‘referral’ to hospital increased likelihood of admission, average length of stay decreased by eight days (from 12 to 4).3
- Limitations: Indirect comparisons of different cohorts.
- Pre-SIS: 35% of 598 Vancouver intravenous drug users (IVDUs) admitted over three year period.2
- Ambulance calls:
- In the vicinity of SIS, average monthly ambulance calls with naloxone treatment for suspected opioid overdose decreased from 27 to 9, relative risk reduction = 67%.4
- Disease transmission:
- Mathematical modelling on HIV infection prevention by SIS:
- HIV infections prevented ranges from ~6 to 57 per year.5,6
- Limitations: Assumptions made about drug use/injecting practices and may include benefit of co-existent needle exchange program.6
- Mathematical modelling on HIV infection prevention by SIS:
- Systematic review had similar findings.7
- Age standardized mortality rate among IVDU is ~8x higher than rest of population.8
- Benefit of SIS likely limited by site capacity:
- SIS assists only ~4% of all injections in Vancouver’s downtown eastside.5
- Educating SIS users likely contributes to decreased syringe borrowing (37% in 1996 to 2% in 2011).8
- At Vancouver SIS, ~1 overdose per 1,000 injections; no fatal overdose reported.9
- Cost effectiveness: All studies show healthcare savings for every SIS dollar spent.6,10,11
- Opening SIS does not increase arrests for drug trafficking, assaults, or robberies.12
Latest Tools for Practice
#379 Bumpin’ Up the Protection? RSV Vaccine in Pregnancy
How effective and safe is the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine (AbrysvoTM) when given during pregnancy?
#378 Tony Romo-sozumab: Winning touchdown in osteoporosis or interception for the loss?
What is the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis?
#377 How to slow the flow IV: Combined oral contraceptives
In premenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding due to benign etiology, do combined oral contraceptives (COC) improve patient outcomes?
Great article. Confirmed what I know.