#20 Strategies for initiating insulin in Type 2 Diabetics
CLINICAL QUESTION
What is the optimal regimen for initiating insulin in type 2 diabetes
BOTTOM LINE
In type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with oral agents, initiating basal insulin results in similar HbA1c reductions compared to prandial or biphasic insulin and may cause less weight gain and hypoglycemia. Family practitioners who start insulin are as effective as specialists.
Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits
Join NowAlready a CFPCLearn Member? Log in
EVIDENCE
Five reasonably-sized randomized controlled trials compare regimens for initiating insulin in type 2 diabetes with poor glucose control.
- 4T study1: Followed 708 patients for 3 years comparing long-acting basal insulin once daily, biphasic premixed insulin twice daily or prandial insulin with meals.1
- HbA1c levels were not significantly different between the three groups,
- Significantly more patients in the basal and prandial groups attained HbA1c ≤7.0% (63% and 67% versus 49% biphasic).
- Basal insulin had statistically significant:
- Less weight gain (3.6kg) than prandial (6.4kg) or biphasic insulin (5.7kg),
- Fewer confirmed symptomatic hypoglycemic events/person/yr (1.7 basal versus 3.0 biphasic, versus 5.7 prandial),
- More patients requiring a second type of insulin (82% basal, 74% prandial and 68% biphasic),
- Higher total dose of insulin (by weight).
- HbA1c levels were not significantly different between the three groups,
- The four remaining studies (APOLLO2, INITIATE3 JDDM 114, and Riddle5) followed 160 to 588 patients for 6-14 months and compared basal to prandial,2 basal to biphasic,3 biphasic to prandial,4 and basal(+/-prandial) to biphasic5 insulin.
- HbA1c was generally similar except biphasic improved HbA1c more and got more people to a HbA1c ≤7.0% than basal in one study,3 but less than basal+prandial in another.5
- Basal insulin had significantly less hypoglycemia (than prandial2 or biphasic3) and weight gain (than biphasic3), and basal(+/-prandial) had less hypoglycemia and weight gain than biphasic.5
- Meta-analyses found similar.6,7
- 4T study1 is given priority because it is the largest, longest and compares the three options. Fortunately, the remaining studies2-5 generally support those findings.
- INSIGHT8 found initiating basal insulin in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes resulted in significantly lower HbA1C than continued oral hypoglycemic agents
- Mean HbA1c and hypoglycemic rates were not different between patients of family practitioners or diabetes experts.9
- There is no evidence that insulin is superior to oral agents in reducing clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.10
- Specialists are five times more likely to initiate insulin than family practitioners.11
Latest Tools for Practice
#389 An ASA a day keeps the Afib at bay?
How do ASA and direct oral anticoagulants compare in atrial fibrillation and bleeding risk?
#388 Stop the Drip: Tranexamic Acid Solution for Nosebleeds
Can topical tranexamic acid treat epistaxis?
#387 Side effects of long-term PPI use: Leaving a bad taste in your mouth?
What are the side effects of long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use?
