#206 Agitation in Dementia: Quantifying the effects of antipsychotics
Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits
Join NowAlready a CFPCLearn Member? Log in
- Placebo has large effects.7 Example:
- Improves 11-points on 144-point neuropsychiatric scale, a clinically meaningful difference.
- Atypical antipsychotics:
- Mean improvement over placebo on multiple scales trivial at best:1-3
- Example 3-points on 144-point neuropsychiatric scale, unlikely clinically meaningful.
- Individual antipsychotics (risperidone,2 olanzapine,2 quetiapine5) found similar.
- Exception was improvement on the global change scale of 0.32 points on 7-point scale, likely clinically detectable.
- Proportion of patients attaining 50% improvement in scales.4
- Example: Risperidone 46% versus 33%, Number Needed to Treat (NNT)=8.
- Mean improvement over placebo on multiple scales trivial at best:1-3
- Atypical antipsychotic harms:
- Stopping due to adverse events:2 Number Needed to Harm (NNH)=13-39.
- Serious harms: Death (NNH=77-84),1,4 cerebrovascular events (NNH=48-104).1,2,4
- Mini-Mental Status Exam 0.73 worse (not significant).4
- Other:1,2,4 Somnolence (NNH=7-11), gait abnormalities (NNH=11-20), extrapyramidal symptoms (NNH=16-44), and peripheral edema (NNH=20-25).
- First generation antipsychotics (example haloperidol) appear to have similar rates of harms but inconsistent benefits.6
- Cholinesterase inhibitors, SSRIs, trazodone, and valproate provide no meaningful improvement in agitation.8-11
- Benzodiazepines may approach antipsychotics for efficacy in agitation but also have harms.12
- Stopping antipsychotics may reduce death (NNT=4 at two years) with little impact on neuropsychiatric symptoms.13
- While highlighting harms, guidelines support atypical antipsychotic use:
- In severe aggression if risk to patient/others. Balance benefit versus risk of death and cerebrovascular events.14
- Target agitation without sedation.15