Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#26 Pharmacotherapy for Smoking: What works and what to consider (PART I)?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
In patients ready to make a smoking cessation attempt, how effective are registered first-line medications and what are the potential concerns?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
There are four first-line options of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (gum, patch, lozenge or inhaler) and all improve the chance of abstinence from smoking. For every 17 patients treated with NRT, one will remain abstained from smoking at six months. Adverse events are low but supportive follow-up will allow monitoring and can improve cessation.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
Part I reviews Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) and related issues Part II discusses antidepressants and varenicline
  • NRT: Cochrane systematic review1 of 150 randomized controlled trials (RCTs):
    • Overall Risk Ratio (RR) of abstinence: 1.60 (1.53 to 1.68).
      • Gum: 1.49 (1.40 - 1.60, 55 trials).
      • Patch: 1.64 (1.52 - 1.78, 43 trials).
      • Inhaler: 1.90 (1.36 - 2.67, 4 trials).
      • Lozenge: 1.95 (1.61 - 2.73, 6 trials).
    • Some evidence combining rapid-acting NRT with patch can offer small advantage over monotherapy: RR 1.34 (1.18-1.51, 9 trials).
    • There is no difference in efficacy between NRT and bupropion: RR 1.01 (0.87- 1.18).
    • Adverse events:
      • Local irritation relates to the type of product.
      • No evidence that NRT increases myocardial infarctions.
  • Assuming placebo cessation rates of 10% (mean across studies), the number needed to treat (NNT) for NRT therapy is approximately 17 (range 15-19).
Context:
  • Smoking cessation is the most effective preventive maneuver for conditions including COPD, cancer and cardiovascular disease.
    • For example, an RCT2 of aggressive smoking cessation intervention for 209 patients after CCU admission 2 years later resulted in:
      • 39% quitting versus 9%.
      • 3% mortality versus 12%, for a 9% absolute reduction (NNT 11).
      • For comparison, ASA provides a 1.4% reduction (NNT 72) in mortality in a similar population and time frame.3
  • Pharmacotherapy is safe and effective in a broad range of populations, including the mentally ill.
  • Combining counseling and support with pharmacotherapy improves outcomes.1


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#353 - Turn Down the Heat! Can non-hormonal drugs improve vasomotor symptoms in menopause? (Free)

Do non-hormonal medications improve menopausal vasomotor symptoms?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#352 Do-It-Yourself Hearing Aids (Free)

Do self-fitted hearing aids improve hearing for adults with mild to moderate-severe hearing loss?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#351 Flaked out? Topical treatment for seborrheic dermatitis (Free)

How effective are topical treatments for adult facial or scalp seborrheic dermatitis?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Charl Els MBChB FCPsych (Psychiatry)
  • G. Michael Allan MD CCFP

1. Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, et al. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2012; 11:CD000146.

2. Mohiuddin SM, Mooss AN, Hunter CB, et al. Chest. 2007; 131(2):446–52

3. Berger JS, Brown DL, Becker RC. Am J Med. 2008; 121(1):43-9

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.