Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#407 Back on the stand: Colchicine for secondary cardiovascular prevention update


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
Is colchicine effective for secondary cardiovascular prevention?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
For secondary cardiovascular prevention, colchicine 0.5mg provides a relative risk reduction of ~25% in major adverse cardiovascular events but does not affect mortality. While 1 randomized, controlled trial (RCT) reported a neutral effect, overall, pooled effects remain in favour of colchicine for cardiovascular benefit.   



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
  • 17 systematic reviews1-17 of RCTs published in 2025. Focusing on one including RCTs with ≥12 months follow-up and reporting absolute event rates for patient-important outcomes in secondary cardiovascular prevention (6 RCTs, 21800 patients, 12-34 months, colchicine 0.5mg daily):1
    • Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): Composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and urgent coronary revascularization.
      • Colchicine 8.2% versus placebo 10.3%; Relative risk reduction (RRR)=25%.
    • No difference in cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality or serious adverse events (including infections, hospitalizations for gastrointestinal effects, or cancer).
    • Limitations: 47% not randomized due to gastrointestinal symptoms during open-label colchicine run-in; data limited in stroke patients.
    • Results were consistent across RCTs except for the CLEAR-SYNERGY RCT,18 which showed no effect from colchicine on MACE.
    • Other systematic reviews found similar.2-17
 
  • CLEAR-SYNERGY RCT (7062 patients) randomized patients to colchicine 0.5mg versus placebo ~27 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention. At 3 years:18
    • MACE: No difference.
    • Cardiovascular or all-cause mortality: No difference.
    • Diarrhea: 10% versus 7% (placebo), Number needed to harm=28.
    • Limitations: Potentially underpowered due to underreporting of MACE outcomes during COVID-19 pandemic.1,18

CONTEXT
CONTEXTE
  • Low-dose colchicine is approved by Health Canada in patients with coronary artery disease for reducing atherothrombotic events.19
  • Canadian, European and American guidelines suggest low-dose colchicine in post-acute coronary syndrome patients.20-22
  • Cost (3 months): $90 (0.5mg), $25 (0.6mg).23
  • Despite neutral findings of CLEAR-SYNERGY, colchicine appears to lower the risk of cardiovascular events better than (example: ezetimibe, RRR ~6%) or comparably to (examples: acetylsalicylic acid or statins, RRR ~25%) other preventive therapies.24,25 Of the above, only statins and ASA lower the risk of mortality.


Walid Eshumani February 16, 2026

Thank you


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#408 Testosterone for Women: Desire, data and downsides

Can testosterone improve sexual function in pre or post-menopausal women?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#407 Back on the stand: Colchicine for secondary cardiovascular prevention update

Is colchicine effective for secondary cardiovascular prevention?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#406 Scan, See, Decide: POCUS in the Evaluation of Dyspnea

Is point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) helpful for the evaluation of undifferentiated dyspnea?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Nicolas Dugré PharmD MSc
  • Amélie Gravel MD
  • Danielle Perry RN MSc

1. Samuel M, Berry C, Dubé MP, et al. Eur Heart J. 2025 Jul 7; 46(26):2552-2563.

2. Ebrahimi F, Ebrahimi R, Beer M, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Nov 13; 11(11):CD014808.

3. Ahmed M, Fahim MAA, Humayun M, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Dec; 106(7): 3675-3689.

4. Fallahtafti P, Farooqi M, Looha MA, et al. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Sep 29; 25(1):700.

5. Nazmy A, Sobhy A, Elshahat A, et al. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2025 Nov; 50(11):103169.

6. Hagag AM, Ghanem OA, Khalaf MM, et al. Atherosclerosis. 2025 Sep; 408:120448.

7. Quishpe M, Sanunga M, Ochoa J, et al. Cureus. 2025 Jun 20; 17(6):e86424.

8. Naeem F, Tabassum S, Burhan M, et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Sep; 81(9):1257-1274.

9. Ballacci F, Giordano F, Conte C, et al. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2025 Jul 1; 26(7):359-368.

10. Abdelaziz A, Sobhy A, Nazmy A, et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Jun 12: zwaf332. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf332.

11. Boracchi P, Marano G, Luconi E, et al. Eur J Intern Med. 2025 Oct; 140:106317.

12. Huntermann R, Peres de Oliveira J, Barbosa LM, et al Heart. 2025 May 16: heartjnl-2025-325826. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2025-325826.

13. D'Entremont MA, Poorthuis MHF, Fiolet ATL, et al. Eur Heart J. 2025 Jul 7; 46(26):2564-2575.

14. Tucker B, Tucker WJ, Chung JS, et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 May 16: zwaf302.

15. Shaikh S, Hamza M, Neppala S, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2025 Apr 15; 425:133045.

16. Jaiswal V, Deb N, Hanif M, et al. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025 Jan; 25(1):83-93.

17. Younas A, Awan Z, Khan T, et al. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2025 Jan; 50(1):102878.

18. Jolly SS, d'Entremont MA, Lee SF, et al. N Engl J Med. 2025 Feb 13; 392(7):633-642.

19. Pendopharm. Product monograph: Myinfla. Montreal, Canada. August 2021. Available from: https://pendopharm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/MYINFLA-PM-EN.pdf?x65764

20. Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Post-acute coronary syndrome: Secondary prevention pathway. October 2025. Available from: https://ccs.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/CCS-ACS_Prevention_Pathway_Oct-2025.pdf. Accessed 2026 Jan 15.

21. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12; 44(38):3720-3826.

22. Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. Circulation. 2025 Apr; 151(13):e771-e862.

23. PharmaClik [website]. Montreal, QC: McKesson Canada; 2025. Available from: https://clients.mckesson.ca/. Accessed 2025 Nov 19.

24. Dugré N, Lindblad AJ, Perry D, et al. Can Fam Physician. 2023 Oct; 69(10):701-711.

25. Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration. BMJ 2002; 324(7329):71.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.