Tools for Practice

#65 Niacin added to statins for cardiovascular disease (CVD)? 1 + 1 = 1

In patients with CVD and low HDL levels, does adding niacin to statin therapy decrease future cardiovascular events?

In patients with CVD on conventional therapy, adding niacin does not reduce cardiovascular events. Among lipid treatments, only statin monotherapy has strong evidence for CVD prevention (regardless of lipid levels).

CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

Join Now

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

HPS2-THRIVE:1 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of 25,673 patients (mean age 65, 83% male) with previous CVD taking simvastatin 40 mg +/- ezetimibe 10 mg. 
  • Randomized to niacin extended-release 2,000 mg plus laropiprant 40 mg or placebo for ~4 years. 
  • No difference in primary outcome (combined CVD): 13.2% versus 13.7%. 
  • Niacin increased risk of: 
    • Serious adverse events: 55.6% versus 52.7%Number Needed to Harm (NNH)=35. 
    • Discontinuation due to adverse events: 25.4% versus 16.5%NNH=12. 
  • Niacin improved lipids versus placebo. 
    • LDL -0.25 mmol/LHDL +0.16 mmol/LTriglycerides -0.37 mmol/L. 
Meta-analysis2 of 11 RCTs (including HPS2-THRIVE) of 35,301 patients: 
  • No difference between niacin versus placebo on death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke. 
The Coronary Drug Project RCT:3 Only trial to demonstrate cardiovascular benefit of niacin over placebo. 
  • Enrolled men 30-64 years-old with prior myocardial infarction. 
  • Limitations: Over 40 years old, before statins and other proven secondary prevention therapies (aspirin, ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, etc). 
  • Surrogate outcomes like lipids can be misleading.4 
    • The drug torcetrapib reduced LDL 25% and increased HDL 72%, but increased CVD and mortality.5 
    • Statins improve CVD outcomes irrespective of initial lipid levels6 or the degree of LDL reduction.7 
  • Good evidence demonstrates that statins reduce CVD, particularly in secondary CVD prevention.8 
  • Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines9 recommend treating to lipid targets (LDL, non-HDL, and ApoB), including adding ezetimibe, bile acid resins, or PCSK9 inhibitors to statins if needed. 
    • Niacin recommended only if LDL goal not achieved despite all of the above. 
  • American guidelines10 recommend against niacin due to risk of serious harm with no clinical benefit. 
  • Canadian Primary Care Lipid Guidelines do not recommend niacin.11   

Latest Tools for Practice

#348 How to Slow the Flow III: Tranexamic acid for heavy menstrual bleeding (Free)

In premenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding due to benign etiology, does tranexamic acid (TXA) improve patient outcomes?
Read 0.25 credits available

#347 Chlorthali-D’OH!: What is the best thiazide diuretic for hypertension?

Which thiazide diuretic is best at reducing cardiovascular events in hypertension?
Read 0.25 credits available

#346 Stress Urinary Incontinence: Pelvic floor exercises or pessary? (Free)

How effective are pelvic floor exercises or pessaries for stress urinary incontinence?
Read 0.25 credits available

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access


  • G. Michael Allan MD CCFP
  • Michael R Kolber BSc MD CCFP MSc

1. The HPS2-TRIVE Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371:203-12

2. Keene D, Price C, Shun-Shin MJ, et al. BMJ. 2014; 349:g4379.

3. The Coronary Drug Project Research Group. JAMA. 1975; 231:360-81.

4. Hayward RA, Krumholz HM. Circulation Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012; 5:2-5.

5. Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357:2109-22.

6. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2002; 360:7-22.

7. Hayward RA, Hofer TP, Vijan S. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 145:520-30.

8. Baingent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al. Lancet. 2005; 366:1267-78

9. Anderson TJ, Gregoire J, Pearson GJ, et al. Can J Cardiol. 2016; 32(11): 1263-82.

10. Lloyd-Jones DM, Morris PB, Ballantyne CM, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68:92-125.

11. Allan GM, Lindblad AJ, Comeau A, et al. Can Fam Physician. 2015; 61:857-67.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.