Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#70 What Is the Risk of VTE with Various Hormonal Contraceptives?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
How does the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk compare between hormonal contraceptives?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Due to limits in the evidence, there is uncertainty whether the risks of VTE vary with different hormonal contraceptives. If they do, the increased risk appears to be about one extra VTE a year per 1,250 women.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
There are no long-term randomized controlled trials, which leaves cohort and case-control studies as best evidence. 
  • Studies that found different VTE risk between hormonal contraceptives: 
    • Combined oral contraceptives (COCs): 3rd generation progestins (desogestrel, drospirenone, gestodene, norgestimate, cyproterone) increase VTE risk (about 1.5-2x) over 1st or 2nd generation progestins (levonorgestrel or norethisterone).1-4 
    • Transdermal estrogen and vaginal ring increase VTE risk (about 2x) over combined oral contraceptive (COC) with levonorgestrel.5 
    • Levonorgestrel intra-uterine device (IUD) or progestin-only pills have same VTE risk as non-users.5 
    • Lower-dose estrogen reduces VTE risk.2 
  • Other studies found no increased VTE risk with drospirenone,6 transdermal patch,1 or vaginal ring.7 
  • If these differences are real, the absolute VTE risk per 10,000 woman-years (or 1,000 women over 10 years) may be approximately: 
    • 2-3 for non-users or women using progestin-only pills or progestin IUD.1 
    • 7-9 for use of COC with levonorgestrel or norethisterone.1-3 
    • 10-15 for use of COC with 3rd generation progestin, transdermal patch, or vaginal ring.1,3,5 
    • 29 for pregnancy (for comparison).1 
Context:  
  • Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC)8 have previously stated evidence regarding risk of VTE with different progestins is inconclusive due to mixed results and high risk of bias. 
  • To keep the risk differences in perspective, 1,000-1,250 women would need to switch from higher- to lower-risk of COC to prevent one VTE per year.1,3 
  • Even the largest studies using confirmed VTE3-5 were retrospective and had potential confounding, leaving uncertainty if increased risk is real. 
  • Other factors influencing VTE risk are age (45-49 about 6x risk age 15-19),3,9 obesity (BMI ≥35 about 4x risk of BMI 20-25),3,10 and smoking (about 2x risk).3,10 
updated by ricky July 28, 2016


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#363 Making a difference in indifference? Medications for apathy in dementia

In patients with dementia, how safe and effective are stimulants, antidepressants, and antipsychotics for treating apathy?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#362 Facing the Evidence in Acne, Part I: Oral contraceptives and spironolactone in females

How effective are combined oral contraceptives (COC) and spironolactone for treating acne of at least mild-moderate severity in females?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#361 Preventing RSV Infections in Infants

How safe and effective are monoclonal antibodies to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections in infants?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • G. Michael Allan MD CCFP
  • Sudha Koppula MD MCISc CCFP

1. Martinez F, Ramirez I, Perez-Campos E, et al. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012; 17:7-29.

2. de Bastos M, Stegeman BH, Rosendaal FR, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 3:CD010813.

3. Vinogradova Y, Coupland C, Hippisley-Cox J. BMJ. 2015; 350:h2135.

4. Weill A, Dalichampt M, Raguideau F, et al. BMJ. 2016; 353:i2002.

5. Lidegaard O, Nielsen LH, Skovlund CW, et al. BMJ. 2012; 344:e2990.

6. Dinger JC, Heinemann LA, Kühl-Habich D. Contraception. 2007; 75:344-54.

7. Dinger J, Mohner S, Heinemann K. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122:800-8.

8. Reid R, Leyland N, Wolfman W, et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011; 112:252-6.

9. Lidegaard O, Nielsen LH, Skovlund CW, et al. BMJ. 2011; 343:d6423.

10. Lawrenson R, Farmer R. Contraception. 2000; 62:21S-28S.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.