Credits Earned (2024) Crédits obtenus

Redeem Prepaid Membership

Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#88 Hormone Therapy: Does Timing Make a Difference?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
Is there evidence that starting combination oral hormone therapy (HT) closer to menopause result in reduced risk of harm or even possible benefit?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Evidence supporting the timing hypothesis of HT is not convincing. There is no consistent evidence of benefit with HT beyond symptomatic relief. Smaller but real risks are likely present even in those close to menopause.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
Randomized controlled trial (RCT):1 1006 women (mean age 52) randomized to HT or nothing x10 years 
  • Statistically significant reduction in composite outcome (death, hospitalization for heart failure, and myocardial infarction) in HT users 
    • Hazard ratio (HR) 0.48 (0.26-0.87) 
    • Limitations: Secondary analysis of an osteoporosis study with this outcome defined post-hoc; open-label design; included estrogen-only group; low event rate. 
Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) subgroup analysis:2  
  • Combination HT within 10 years of menopause had non-statistically significant: 
    • Reduced coronary heart disease (CHD): HR 0.88 (0.54-1.43) 
    • Increased stroke: HR 1.58 (0.81-3.05) 
    • Overall more harms than benefits (global index): HR 1.09 (0.87-1.37) 
  • Limitations: Subgroup analysis; >130 statistical tests, only 2 statistically significant (6-7 expected by chance alone). 
2nd subgroup analysis of WHI3 (>300 comparisons) reported increased breast cancer if HT started <5 years after menopause versus >5 years (p=0.03).  Cochrane review of 19 RCTs (40,410 patients):4 
  • Subgroup analysis showed decreased mortality and CHD in HT users <10 years post-menopause, but not >10 years 
  • No evidence that risk of stroke or venous thromboembolism (VTE) lower if HT started <10 years of menopause 
  • Limitations: Risk reductions driven by above RCT1 and estrogen-only group of WHI (hysterectomy patients), which is not likely generalizable to patients without hysterectomy 
  • Older systematic review of 30 RCTs found similar effects on mortality for age <60 versus >60.5 
Context:  
  • HT is effective for vasomotor and some urogenital symptoms in post-menopausal women.6 
  • Another Cochrane review7 of 23 RCTs (42,830 patients, mean >60 years) reported small statistically-significant increased risk for cardiovascular events, VTE, stroke, and breast cancer with HT. 
updated aug 13, 2016 by ricky


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#367 Oral Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Antagonists: A painfully long name for the acute treatment of migraines

What are the risks and benefits of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of episodic migraines?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#366 Looking for Closure: Managing simple excisions or wounds efficiently

What are some options for efficiency in wound closure?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#365 Shrooms for Glooms: Evidence for psilocybin for depression

What are the benefits and harms of psilocybin for treatment-resistant/recurrent depression?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Christina Korownyk MD CCFP
  • Loren Regier BSP BA

1. Schierbeck LL, Rejnmark L, Tofteng CL, et al. BMJ 2012;345:e6409.

2. Rossouw JE, Prentice RL, Manson JE, et al. JAMA 2007;297:1465-77.

3. Prentice RL, Manson JE, Langer RD, et al. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:12-23.

4. Boardman HMP, Hartley L, Eisinga A, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;3:CD002229.

5. Salpeter SR, Walsh JME, Greyber E, Ormiston TM, Salpeter EE. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:791-804.

6. Nelson H, Haney E, Humphrey L, et al. Management of menopause-related symptoms: Evidence report/Technology Assessment No. 120; Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005.

7. Marjoribanks J, Farquhar C, Roberts H, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;7:CD004143.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.

Most recent review: 13/08/2016

By: Ricky Turgeon BSc(Pharm) ACPR PharmD

Comments:

Evidence Updated: New Cochrane review; Bottom Line: No change.

Learning at a glance
Yearly credits
Acquired ()
Your content by topic
Cardiology Dermatology Emergency
My Bookmarks