Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#374 Vitamin D and Fracture Prevention: Not what it’s cracked up to be?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
Does vitamin D prevent fragility fractures?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Vitamin D alone does not prevent fractures regardless of dose, vitamin D status or previous fracture. The combination of calcium and vitamin D might reduce the risk of total fractures from 11.5% to 10.9% and hip fractures from 1.8% to 1.5% over 9-84 months, but this benefit may be limited to women in long-term care. Adding calcium increases risk of renal calculi (2.1% to 2.5%).



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
  • Eight systematic reviews1-8 of 7-36 randomized controlled trials (RCTs); 34,000-76,000 mostly community-dwelling women: some with previous fracture, established osteoporosis or metabolic bone disease, followed 9-84 months.
  • Vitamin D versus placebo/no treatment:
    • Total fracture:1-8 No difference.
    • Hip fracture:1-5,8 No difference. One systematic review7 (varying high doses) suggested slightly higher risk in women (1.2% versus 0.9%).
    • Total or hip fractures:
      • High dose (>800 IU): Three systematic reviews1,4,8 showed no difference, one7 showed increased risk (described above) and one6 showed benefit, but no absolute numbers reported.
      • Baseline vitamin D level <50 nmol/L1 or previous fracture:2 No difference.
  • Vitamin D-calcium combination versus placebo:
    • Total fracture: 10.9% versus 11.5% (placebo), number needed to treat (NNT)=167.2 Others showed similar.3,5,6 One systematic review did not report largest RCT.1
      • Removing two RCTs of women in long-term care: Results no longer statistically different.2
    • Hip fracture:25% versus 1.8% (placebo), NNT=333.
      • Two systematic reviews found similar; 3,5 one found no difference.8
    • Total or hip fracture:
      • Baseline vitamin D <50 nmol/L1 or previous fracture:1,2 No difference.
  • Adverse events:
    • Vitamin D alone: None.2
    • Combination: No difference in mortality or gastrointestinal effects;2 renal calculi increased (2.5% versus 2.1% placebo).7
  • Limitations: Disproportionate number of smaller positive studies, skewing results towards favouring vitamin D.2,4 Randomization process and concealment uncertain.2

CONTEXT
CONTEXTE
  • Calcium alone has no effect on the risk of total or hip fracture.1,8
  • Osteoporosis Canada: Supplementation with vitamin D and calcium is unlikely to have clinically important benefit if diet contains adequate calcium.9
  • Measuring vitamin D levels routinely is unnecessary. No RCTs have evaluated treating to a target vitamin D level to prevent fractures.10


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#374 Vitamin D and Fracture Prevention: Not what it’s cracked up to be?

Does vitamin D prevent fragility fractures?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#373 Strategies for initiating insulin in type 2 diabetes

What is the optimal initial insulin for patients with type 2 diabetes?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#372 Mission Slimpossible Part 2: Oral GLP-1 agonists for weight loss

Are oral GLP-1 agonists effective for weight loss?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Jennifer Young MD CCFP-EM
  • Émélie Braschi MD PhD

1. Zhao JG, Zeng XT, Wang J et al. JAMA. 2017 Dec 26; 318(24):2466-2482.

2. Avenell A, Mak JC, O'Connell D. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 14; 2014(4):CD000227.

3. Bolland MJ, Grey A, Gamble GD, et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Apr; 2(4):307-320.

4. Bolland MJ, Grey A, Avenell A. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Nov; 6(11):847-858.

5. Yao P, Bennett D, Mafham M. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2; 2(12):e1917789.

6. Thanapluetiwong S, Chewcharat A, Takkavatakarn K, et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 21; 99(34):e21506.

7. de Souza MM, Moraes Dantas RL, Leão Durães V, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jul 12. DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08933-1.

8. Khatri K, Kaur M, Dhir T, et al. Indian J Med Res. 2023 Jan; 158(1):5-16.

9. Morin SN, Feldman S, Funnell L, et al. CMAJ. 2023 Oct 10; 195(39):E1333-E1348.

10. Lindblad A, McCormack J, Garrison S. Vitamin D Levels: Vitamin Do or Vitamin Don’t. Tools for Practice #106. Available at https://cfpclearn.ca/tfp106/. Accessed on May 2, 2024.

Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.