Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#389 An ASA a day keeps the Afib at bay?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
How do ASA and direct oral anticoagulants compare in atrial fibrillation and bleeding risk?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
For patients of any age with atrial fibrillation, apixaban is superior to ASA for the prevention of strokes or systemic embolisms (1.6% apixaban versus 3.7% ASA) with no increased risk of intra-cranial hemorrhage or major bleeding. Other direct oral anticoagulants have not been studied in this context.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
  • Results statistically different unless
  • In atrial fibrillation,1 only one Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) comparing direct oral anticoagulants (apixaban) to ASA. 5599 participants with atrial fibrillation unsuitable for warfarin (example: labile INR), age~70, CHADS~2. After ~1.1 years:
    • Stroke/systemic embolism: 1.6% (apixaban) versus 3.7% (ASA).
      • <65 years old: 0.7% versus 2% (ASA), Number Needed to Treat (NNT)=77.
      • >75 years old: 2% versus 6.1% (ASA), NNT=25.
      • >85 years old: 1% versus 7.5% (ASA). NNT=16.2
    • Major bleeding: 1.4% versus 1.2% (ASA), not statistically different.
      • No significant differences in any age subgroup (including >85) between apixaban and ASA, but risk increases with age, example (apixaban): 0.7% <65 years-old versus 4.7% >85 years-old.1,2
    • Intracranial hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding, no differences (0.4% all groups).
  • Bleeding risks, various populations (example: embolic strokes of undetermined source). One systematic review of direct oral anticoagulants versus ASA. After ~17.2 months:3
    • Apixaban (4 RCTS, 10,978 patients):
      • Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% versus 0.8% ASA), not different.
      • Major hemorrhage (2.8% versus 2.4% ASA), not different.
    • Dabigatran (2 RCTs, 5,695 patients):
      • Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (1.2% versus 1.2% ASA), not different.
      • Major hemorrhage (2.7% versus 2.3% ASA), not different.
    • Rivaroxaban (3 RCTs, 28,821 patients):
      • Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (0.4% versus 0.2% ASA), Number Needed to Harm (NNH)=500.
      • Major hemorrhage (2.2% versus 1.4% ASA), NNH=125.
  • Limitations: Few RCTs in frail patients, different populations, limited information regarding types of bleeding events.

CONTEXT
CONTEXTE
  • 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines:4
    • Oral anti-coagulation: >65 years-old/history of stroke, hypertension, heart failure, diabetes.
    • Otherwise: No antithrombotic unless recommended for secondary prevention coronary/peripheral artery disease.
  • Apixaban, edoxaban superior to warfarin for prevention stroke/systemic embolism, less major bleeding events.5,6


armel bemmo May 11, 2025

No antithrombotic unless recommended for secondary prevention coronary/peripheral artery disease

Robert Ramsey May 12, 2025

DOAC better than Warfarin for prevention of stroke/embolism

Mike morris May 12, 2025

Confirmation

O. Adesanya May 17, 2025

DOACs have less bleeding events than warfarin

Jasbinder Purewal May 17, 2025

confirmation

Rohit Chadha May 18, 2025

nice

Rohit Chadha May 18, 2025

nice explanation

Ken Jaskolka May 19, 2025

Confirms my practice of using Apixaban over ASA

Maria Kukovica May 24, 2025

If a major drop in Hb to 83 from about 110 and negative endoscopy for source should you stop Apixaban completely?

Ken Murray May 27, 2025

Reassuring

Abu Arif May 27, 2025

GOOD TO KNOW

Abu Arif May 27, 2025

NEW INFORMATION

SVETLANA DOLGUINA June 1, 2025

Good summary.

ZAHID AHMAD June 2, 2025

Apaxiban is the safest and most effective.

MOHANAD YASEEN June 14, 2025

informative

Lyn Boorman June 15, 2025

no significant difference between apixaban and ASA wrt bleeding risks, nice to learn
apixaban better wrt stroke prevention

Gilbert Bretecher June 19, 2025

ASA not as effective

Peter Clifford June 24, 2025

Apixiban better than ASA without increased bleeding risks.

Randell Smith July 5, 2025

I agree that apixiban is superior to ASA in stroke prevention

Lindsey Lytle September 4, 2025

good information for young patients with Afib.


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#403 A Whiff of Prevention: Treating Male Partners to Reduce Bacterial Vaginosis Recurrence

Does treating male sexual partners of females undergoing treatment for bacterial vaginosis infection decrease recurrence?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#402 Nipple Confusion or Nonsense? Pacifiers and Breastfeeding Duration

In term infants, does restricting early use of pacifiers result in higher rates of breastfeeding up to 6 months of age?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#401 Vape Expectations: Are electronic cigarettes the real deal for smoking cessation? (Update)

Are nicotine-containing e-cigarettes more effective than other available options for smoking cessation?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Émélie Braschi MD PhD
  • Jennifer Young MD CCFP-EM

1. Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C et al. N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):806-817.

2. Ng KH, Shestakovska O, Connolly AJ et al. Age Ageing. 2016 Jan;45(1):77-83.

3. Coyle M, Lynch A, Higgins M et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2449017.

4. Andrade, JG, Aguilar M, Atzema C et al. Can J Cardiol. 2020 Dec;36(12):1847-1948.

5. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E et al. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369:2093-104.

6. Kolber M, Bungard T. Novel Oral Anti-coagulants (NOACs): is newer better? Tools For Practice # 73. August 5, 2016. Available at https://cfpclearn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/TFP73.pdf Accessed on Jan 15-2025.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.