Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#417 Deprescribing Cholinesterase Inhibitors: Good or bad idea?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
What are the effects of deprescribing cholinesterase inhibitors?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Benefits of cholinesterase inhibitors are unclear, especially when dementia progresses. In patients with moderate-severe Alzheimer’s dementia, deprescribing cholinesterase inhibitors, on average, worsens cognition by 1-2 points on the Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE). Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) have not assessed the proportion of patients with clinically meaningful worsening of cognition or neuropsychiatric symptoms.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
  • Results statistically significant unless indicated.
  • MMSE (1-30, high=better),1,2 clinically meaningful difference: 1.4-2.
  • Neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI) (1-144, low=better),2clinically meaningful difference: 8.
  • Severe dementia, participants already on anticholinesterase inhibitors (mostly >2 years):
    • Participants with MMSE~9:
      • 146 participants, randomized to placebo (with taper) or continuation donepezil for 52 weeks.2
        • MMSE: Baseline ~9, changed to ~3.5 (placebo) versus ~5.5 (donepezil).
        • NPI: Not statistically different.
      • 40 participants, randomized to placebo (with taper) or continuation donepezil/galantamine for 8 weeks.3
        • MMSE: Not statistically different.
    • MMSE~1:
      • 65 participants, randomized to placebo or continuation donepezil/memantine (no taper) for 12 weeks.4
        • Cognitive examination (1-25, higher=better): Donepezil/memantine 0.9 better.
        • NPI: Not statistically different.
  • Moderate dementia:
    • MMSE~19-21:
      • 202 participants tolerating donepezil but without benefits after 12 weeks, randomized to placebo (no taper) or continuation for another 12 weeks.5
        • MMSE: Baseline ~19, changed to ~19.5 (placebo) versus ~20.5 (donepezil).
        • NPI: Donepezil 3.2 better.
      • 96 participants tolerating donepezil after 12 weeks, randomized to placebo (no taper) or continuing donepezil for 12 weeks.1
        • MMSE: Baseline 21, changed to ~19 (placebo) versus ~21 (donepezil).
        • NPI: Donepezil 6.2 better.
  • Overall adverse events: No difference.6
  • Systematic review including two RCTs with galantamine: Similar. 6
  • Limitations: Poor adherence; industry funding; 1,5 unclear if scale changes reflect return to baseline (as if medication never started) versus clinical worsening; limited functional assessment data.6

CONTEXT
CONTEXTE
  • Patients with adverse effects should stop cholinesterase-inhibitors.6,7
  • Long-term use is controversial due to short duration/limitations of RCTs. 6,7
  • Guideline: Consider stopping in those without benefits through shared decision-making with individuals/caregivers.7
    • Possible severe withdrawal reactions in case reports (agitation, hallucinations).
    • Tapering recommended, example: Halve dose every four weeks.
    • Monitor, consider re-initiation if worsening of condition.


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#417 Deprescribing Cholinesterase Inhibitors: Good or bad idea?

What are the effects of deprescribing cholinesterase inhibitors?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#416 Mood Medicine for a Moody Gut: Antidepressants in IBS

Do antidepressants improve irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#415 Blood Pressure Measurement Technique: Meaningful mistakes or minor details?

Does following recommended blood pressure measurement techniques impact the accuracy of readings?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Émélie Braschi MD PhD CCFP
  • Karenn Chan MD CCFP CAC COE

1. Holmes C, Wilkinson D, Dean C et al. Neurology. 2004;63: 214-19.

2. Howard R, McShane R, Lindesay J et al. New Engl J Med. 2012;366: 893-903.

3. Hermann N, O'Regan J, Ruthirakuhan M et al. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Feb;17(2): 142-7.

4. Hong YJ, Choi SH, Jeong JH, et al. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;63(3): 1035-1044.

5. Johannsen P, Salmon E, Hampel H et al. CNS Drugs. 2006;20(4): 311-25.

6. Parsons C, Lim WY, Loy C, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 3;2(2): CD009081.

7. Reeve E, Farell B, Thompson W et al. Med J Aust. 2019 Mar;210(4): 174-179.

Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.