Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#416 Mood Medicine for a Moody Gut: Antidepressants in IBS


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
Do antidepressants improve irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) improve overall IBS symptoms and abdominal pain in ~55% of patients versus ~35% with placebo at ~2-6 months. Mirtazapine shows similar, based on 1 small randomized, controlled trial (RCT). About 25-55% experience adverse effects (examples: drowsiness, dry mouth) with TCAs or mirtazapine compared to 5-35% with placebo. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) achieve similar pain relief but without consistent overall improvement. Limited evidence to suggest differing efficacy based on IBS subtype.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
  • Focusing on the largest systematic review. Doses generally on lower end; half of RCTs specified IBS subtype. At 1.5-6 months:1
    • TCAs (14 RCTs, 1290 patients): Including largest, primary care only RCT of amitriptyline 10-30mg.2
      • Proportion with global IBS improvement (pain, bloating, quality of life): 56% versus 37% (placebo); number needed to treat (NNT)=6.
      • Proportion with abdominal pain improvement: 54% versus 33% (placebo); NNT=5.
      • Adverse event withdrawals: 10% versus 6% (placebo); number needed to harm (NNH)=25.
        • Adverse events in largest RCT (drowsiness, dry mouth): 54% versus 35% (placebo); NNH=5 for each.2
    • SSRIs (8 RCTs, 385 patients) and SNRIs (3 RCTs, 134 patients):
      • Global improvement: No difference.
      • Abdominal pain improvement: 45-93% versus 25-66% (placebo); NNT=4-5.
      • Adverse events: No difference.
    • Mirtazapine (1 RCT, 67 patients):
      • Global improvement: 62% versus 30% (placebo); NNT=4.
      • Abdominal pain improvement: 65% versus 27% (placebo); NNT=3.
      • Adverse events (drowsiness, dry mouth, fatigue, weight gain): 25-35% versus 3-9% (placebo); NNH=4-5 for each.3
    • Other systematic reviews similar.4-6
    • Majority of TCAs, SSRIs, and SNRIs studied: No clear within-class differences.
  • Limitations: Most RCTs small and short duration (4-12 weeks), high dropout rates, publication bias, inconsistent definitions of meaningful improvement.

CONTEXT
CONTEXTE
  • Guidelines7 and pathways8 recommend TCAs or SSRIs regardless of comorbid depression or anxiety.
  • Largest TCA RCT suggests possible preferential benefit for diarrhea-predominant IBS,2 but overall support for this theoretical benefit is weak.9
  • Indirectly, dietary interventions (examples: FODMAP, Mediterranean diet) may have comparable efficacy to antidepressants.10-12
    • Evidence for antidepressants appears stronger than for antispasmodics, probiotics, or opioid receptor modulators.13-15


Sanaz Sarikhani June 18, 2026

Excellent topic

Donald Butt June 22, 2026

Very useful information for a common problem

CHIN KEE LIU June 30, 2026

useful subject


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#421 Happiness is a Dry Bed: Desmopressin for pediatric nocturnal enuresis

Does desmopressin reduce bedwetting for children with nocturnal enuresis?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#420 Scratching the Surface: What is the most effective treatment for scabies?

For adults and children with classic scabies, how effective are treatment options and what is the duration of treatment?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#419 Vitamin B12 Deficiency: Monthly shots or daily pills?

In patients with vitamin B12 deficiency, is oral vitamin B12 as effective as intramuscular (IM) vitamin B12?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Ethan Harasyn PharmD Candidate
  • Madison Waites PharmD Candidate
  • Michael R Kolber MD CCFP MSc
  • Paul Fritsch MD CCFP
  • Jamie Falk PharmD

1. Khasawneh M, Mokhtare M, Moayyedi P, et al. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025;10(6): 537-549.

2. Ford AC, Wright-Hughes A, Alderson SL, et al. Lancet. 2023;402(10414): 1773-1785.

3. Khalilian A, Ahmadimoghaddam D, Saki S, et al. Biopsychosoc Med. 2021;15(1): 3.

4. Temido MJ, Cristiano M, Gouveia C, et al. Ann Gastroenterol. 2025;38(3): 284-293.

5. Ford AC, Lacy BE, Harris LA, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114(1): 21-39.

6. Iqbal M, Hira S, Saeed H, et al. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025;31(1): 28-37.

7. Moayyedi P, Andrews CN, MacQueen G, et al. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2019;2(1): 6-29.

8. Alberta Health Services: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Primary Care Pathway (2023): https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/about/scn/ahs-scn-dh-pathway-ibs.pdf; Accessed Mar 4, 2026.

9. Wright-Hughes A, Ow P-L, Alderson SL, et al. Gut. 2025;74: 728–739.

10. Khan Z, Muhammad SA, Amin MS, et al. Cureus. 2025;17(1): e77053.

11. Bamidele JO, Brownlow GM, Flack RM, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2025;178(12): 1709-1717.

12. Cuffe MS, Staudacher HM, Aziz I, et al. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025;10(6): 520-536.

13. Konstantis G, Efstathiou S, Pourzitaki C, et al. Clin Nutr. 2023;42(5): 800-809.

14. Black CJ, Yuan Y, Selinger CP, et al. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(2): 117-131.

15. Li X, Li B, Zhang J, et al. Medicine 2021;100: 4(e24361).

Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.