Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#76 Amoxicillin, Still an A-List Antibiotic for Infections of the Airway


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
When needed, are beta-lactam antibiotics (such as amoxicillin) a reasonable choice in mild-to-moderate bacterial respiratory tract infections in primary care?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
In mild-to-moderate respiratory tract infections that require antibiotics, there is little evidence of benefit of broader-spectrum antibiotics over traditional beta-lactam antibiotics like amoxicillin in primary care.  The only exception may be slight benefits for broader-spectrum in COPD patients, but these results are inconsistent.  



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
Overall lower-respiratory tract infections: 
  • Cochrane review1 of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of 2,648 patients with any kind of lower-respiratory tract infection: 
  • No statistically significant difference between azithromycin and amoxicillin with/without clavulanate. 
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP): 
  • Cochrane review:2 Only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing a beta-lactam antibiotic to another antibiotic in outpatients with CAP 
    • Authors could not extract outcome data for this comparison. 
  • In CAP patients, including those hospitalized: 
    • Cochrane review3 of 28 RCTs (5,939 patients) and 2 subsequent RCTs:4,5 
      • No benefit in mortality or clinical efficacy with broader coverage for atypicals compared to beta-lactam monotherapy. 
COPD: 
  • RCT with 137 mild-to-moderately symptomatic primary care patients with acute exacerbation of COPD.6 
    • No difference in clinical cure between amoxicillin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate (91% versus 93%). 
  • Systematic review7 of 12 RCTs including 2,261 patients with chronic bronchitis (not necessarily COPD) compared “1st-line” antibiotics (like amoxicillin or doxycycline) versus “2nd-line” antibiotics (like macrolides and quinolones) for acute exacerbations: 
    • Symptom resolution/improvement: 85% for 1st-line antibiotics versus 91% for 2nd-line (difference statistically significant). 
      • Studies ranged from 19% worse to 8% better with first-line antibiotics, no heterogeneity testing was reported 
      • No difference in mortality. 
Sinusitis: 
  • Systematic review8 of 8 RCTs including 2,133 patients found no difference in clinical cure between beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones. 
  • Two RCTs (total 359 children) compared amoxicillin to amoxicillin-clavulanate for acute sinusitis and neither found benefit with amoxicillin-clavulanate.9,10 
Context:  
  • Majority of respiratory tract infections are viral and will not require antibiotics. 
  • Macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae is rapidly increasing (2% in 1993 to 24% in 2009), whereas resistance to amoxicillin is just over 3%.11 
  • Limited data report increasing prevalence of Haemophilus influenza among upper respiratory tract infections after the introduction of the conjugated pneumococcal vaccine, although clinical impact has not been demonstrated in well-designed RCTs.12 


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#364 Facing the Evidence in Acne, Part II: Oral Antibiotics

How effective are oral antibiotics in treating acne of at least mild-moderate severity?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#363 Making a difference in indifference? Medications for apathy in dementia

In patients with dementia, how safe and effective are stimulants, antidepressants, and antipsychotics for treating apathy?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#362 Facing the Evidence in Acne, Part I: Oral contraceptives and spironolactone in females

How effective are combined oral contraceptives (COC) and spironolactone for treating acne of at least mild-moderate severity in females?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Christina Korownyk MD CCFP
  • Sarah Forgie MD FRCPC

1. Laopaiboon M, Panpanich R, Swa Mya K. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;3:CD001954.

2. Pakhale S, Mulpuru S, Verheij TJM, Kochen MM, Rohde GGU, Bjerre JM. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;10:CD002109.

3. Eliakim-Raz N, Robenshtok E, Shefet D, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;9:CD004418.

4. Garin N, Genne D, Carballo S, et al. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:1894-901.

5. Postma DF, van Wekhoven CH, van Elden LJR, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1312-23.

6. Llor C, Hernández S, Ribas A, et al. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2009;4:45-53.

7. Dimopoulos G, Siempos II, Korbila IP, et al. Chest 2007;132:447-55.

8. Karageorgopoulos DE, Giannopoulou KP, Grammatikos AP, Dimopoulos G, Falagas ME. CMAJ 2008;178:845-54.

9. Wald ER, Chiponis D, Ledesma-Medina J. Pediatrics 1986;77:795–800.

10. Garbutt JM, Goldstein M, Gellman E, et al. Pediatrics 2001;107:619–25.

11. Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network http://microbiology.mtsinai.on.ca/research/cbsn/default.asp [Accessed 2 Aug 2016]

12. Coker TR, Chan LS, Newberry SJ. JAMA 2010;304:2161-9.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.