Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique

#77 Zoster vaccine: Zoster Loster or Imposter Coster?

What are the benefits of the zoster vaccine to our patients?

Over 3 years, zoster vaccine will prevent one case of shingles for every 60-70 patients vaccinated, and one case of post-herpetic neuralgia in 350. Long-term benefits, and effectiveness in specific patient populations (immunocompromised, previous shingles) are unclear.

CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session

Two (RCTs) in immunocompetent patients of zoster vaccine (Zostavax) versus placebo vaccine: 
  • 38,546 age >60 (median age 69). Outcomes at 3 years:1 
    • Herpes zoster (Shingles) 
      • Vaccine 1.67%, placebo 3.42%, number needed to treat (NNT)=58 
    • Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN): 
      • Vaccine 0.14%, placebo 0.42%, NNT=358 
    • 7-year outcomes of a subgroup2 of patients not helpful as all placebo patients offered vaccine, thus numbers difficult to interpret. 
  • 22,439 age 50-59 (mean age 55) followed 1.3 years:3 
    • Shingles: Vaccine 0.27%, placebo 0.88%, NNT=164 
    • Limitations: Short follow-up, PHN rates not reported. 
  • Adverse events: ~1% more patients had systemic adverse events1,3,4 and serious adverse events also greater with vaccine (1.9% versus 1.3%).1 
RCT of 15,411 immunocompetent patients >50 years-old (mean age 62, 39% male) of new adjuvant zoster vaccine (not yet available in Canada) followed 3.2 years:  
  • Shingles: Vaccine 0.12%, placebo 3.05%, NNT=35 
  • PHN rates not reported 
  • Adverse events:  
    • 9% more patients had systemic adverse eventbut no difference in serious adverse events. 
  • Although vaccine reduces relative risk of shingles 50-70%, we need to vaccine 60-70 patients to prevent 1 case of shingles over 3 years with currently-available vaccine.1,3 
  • Shingles rates increase with age: 3/1000 per year in age 40-64 to 7.5/1000 per year in age >75.6 
    • ~11% of patients age >60 who develop shingles develop PHN.1 
    • PHN risk increases with age,7,8 and is rare (~1%) when <50 years.7 
  • Low risk of recurrent shingle,1,9 but when including immunocompromised patients, may be as high as 5.7% over 7 years.10 
  • Guideline recommendations: 
    • Canada: Vaccinate >60 years, may vaccinate 50-59 year-olds11 
    • US: Vaccinate >60 years, do not recommend vaccinating 50-59 years 
  • Cost of Zostavax ~$200 
  • Remaining questions: 
    • Safe and effective in immunocompromised patients? 
    • Beneficial if previous shingles? 
    • Long-term efficacy (will booster be required)?  
updated aug 5 2016 Ricky Turgeon BSc(Pharm) ACPR PharmD

Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#365 Shrooms for Glooms: Evidence for psilocybin for depression

What are the benefits and harms of psilocybin for treatment-resistant/recurrent depression?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#364 Facing the Evidence in Acne, Part II: Oral Antibiotics

How effective are oral antibiotics in treating acne of at least mild-moderate severity?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#363 Making a difference in indifference? Medications for apathy in dementia

In patients with dementia, how safe and effective are stimulants, antidepressants, and antipsychotics for treating apathy?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session

  • Michael R Kolber MD CCFP MSc
  • Tony Nickonchuk BScPharm CDE

1. Oxman MN, Levin MJ, Johnson GR, et al. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2271-84.

2. Schmader KE, Oxman MN, Levin MJ, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:1320-8.

3. Schmader KE, Levin MJ, Gnann JW, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:922–8.

4. Simberkoff MS, Arbeit RD, Johnson GR, et al. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:545-54.

5. Lal H, Cunningham AL, Godeaux O, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2087-96.

6. Boivin G, Jovey R, Elliott CT, Patrick DM. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2010; 21:45-52.

7. Drolet M, Brisson M, Schmader KE, et al. CMAJ 2010;182:1731-6.

8. Helgason S, Petursson G, Gudmundsson S, et al. BMJ 2000;321:794-6.

9. Tseng HF, Chi M, Smith N, et al. J Infect Dis 2012;206:190–6.

10. Yawn BP, Wollan PC, Kurland MJ, et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2011;86:88-93.

11. [Accessed 5 Aug 2016]

12. [Accessed 5 Aug 2016]

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.