Credits Earned (2024) Crédits obtenus

Redeem Prepaid Membership

Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#83 Febuxostat: Precipitating Crystals of Evidence About Gout Prevention


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
Does febuxostat (Uloric) offer any advantages over allopurinol in preventing gout?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Febuxostat is not better than allopurinol for preventing gout and has a higher rate of gout flares. It should only be considered in patients who have experienced a serious adverse event with allopurinol.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
Meta-analysis1 of 5 randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in Canada,1 US2-4 and Japan5,6 including 4250 mostly-male patients with gout 
  • 3 RCTs gave colchicine or naproxen (8 or 24 weeks2-4), whereas the other 2 trials did not provide any prophylaxis against gout flares5,6  
  • Febuxostat 40-240 mg compared to allopurinol 200-300 mg daily x8-52 weeks 
  • Gout episodes: Significant increase with febuxostat 
    • 43.6% versus 38.1% with allopurinol (number needed to harm [NNH]=19) 
  • Tophi number and size: No difference2,3 
  • Achieved serum uric acid <360 µmol/L: Febuxostat 66.4% versus 43.2% with allopurinol. 
2 RCTs conducted in China7,8 
  • 5167 and 5048 mostly-male patients, given colchicine or NSAID x8 weeks7 or NSAID for trial duration,8 randomized to febuxostat 40 or 80 mg, or allopurinol 300 mg daily for ~6 months 
    • No difference in gout episodes between groups 
    • No difference in number of tophi7 
    • Serum uric acid <360 µmol/L more likely with febuxostat 80 mg versus both febuxostat 40 mg and allopurinol.  
Studies’ methodological weaknesses: Selective reporting of clinical outcomes, emphasizing surrogate outcomes, and under-dosing allopurinol.  Context:  
  • Start urate-lowering therapy at low dose and titrate up every 2-6 weeks, and use colchicine or NSAIDs for ~6 months to prevent initial flares.9-11 
  • Though it lowers serum uric acid, allopurinol has never been shown in RCTs to reduce gout flares.12 
  • Allopurinol adverse events: Mild rash, pruritus (~2%); allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome (severe rash, fever, hepatitis and renal toxicity) [<1/1000].13,14 
  • Yearly costsFebuxostat 80 mg ~$680 (approved Canadian dose), allopurinol 300 mg ~$100.15 
  • Febuxostat cardiovascular safety has been questioned16 and is being studied (NCT01101035). 


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#378 Tony Romo-sozumab: Winning touchdown in osteoporosis or interception for the loss?

What is the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#377 How to slow the flow IV: Combined oral contraceptives

In premenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding due to benign etiology, do combined oral contraceptives (COC) improve patient outcomes?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#376 Testosterone supplementation for cis-gender men: Let’s (andro-)pause for a moment (Update)

What are the benefits and harms of testosterone supplementation in healthy cis-gender men or those with age-related low testosterone?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Michael R Kolber BSc MD CCFP MSc
  • Tony Nickonchuk BScPharm CDE APA

1. Faruque LI, Ehteshami-Afshar A, Wiebe N, Tjosvold L, Homik J, Tonelli M. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2013;43:367-75.

2. Becker MA, Schumacher Jr HR, Wortmann RL, et al. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2450-61.

3. Schumacher Jr HR, Becker MA, Wortmann RL, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:1540–8.

4. Becker MA, Schumacher Jr HR, Espinoza LR, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2010;2:R63.

5. Kamatani N, Fujimori S, Hada T, et al. J Clin Rheumatol 2011;17:S44-S49.

6. Kamatani N, Fujimori S, Hada T, et al. J Clin Rheumatol 2011;17:S13-S18.

7. Huang X, Du H, Gu J, et al. Int J Rheum Dis 2014;17:679-86.

8. Xu S, Liu X, Ming J, et al. Int J Rheum Dis 2015;18:669-78.

9. Shmerling RH. JAMA 2012;308:2133-41.

10. Neogi T. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:ITC1-ITC16.

11. Borstad GC, Bryant LR, Abel MP. J Rheumatol 2004;31:2429–32.

12. Seth R, Kydd ASR, Buchbinder R, Bombardier C, Edwards CJ. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;10:CD006077.

13. Chao J, Terkeltaub R. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2009;11:135-40.

14. Dalbeth N, Stamp L. Semin Dial 2007;20:391–5.

15. http://www.acfp.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/ACFPPricingDoc2015-final.pdf [Accessed 3 Aug 2016]

16. Schumacher Jr HR, Becker MA, Lloyd E, et al. Rheumatology 2009;48:188–94.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.

Most recent review: 03/08/2016

By: Ricky Turgeon BSc(Pharm) ACPR PharmD

Comments:

Evidence Updated: Updated; Bottom Line: No change.

Learning at a glance
Yearly credits
Acquired ()
Your content by topic
Cardiology Dermatology Emergency
My Bookmarks