#15 Atenolol & Beta-Blockers for Primary Hypertension: Do They Perform Under Pressure?
Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits
Join NowAlready a CFPCLearn Member? Log in
- 2005 meta-analysis1 compared all beta-blockers against other antihypertensives (13 trials; 105,951 patients) over 2.7-10 years.
- Beta-blockers versus all other antihypertensives:
- Statistically significantly increased risk of stroke [Number Needed to Harm (NNH)=461].
- No difference in myocardial infarction or death.
- Atenolol versus non-beta-blocker antihypertensives:
- Statistically significant increased stroke (NNH ~130) and death (NNH ~140).
- Beta-blockers versus all other antihypertensives:
- Similar results in 2004 meta-analysis by same authors,2 Cochrane review,3 and newer meta-analysis.4
- Beta-blockers worse than ACEIs/ARBs, calcium-channel blockers, and diuretics.4
- 2006 meta-analysis5 stratifying trials by age subgroup found different effects when comparing beta-blockers to other antihypertensives:
- <60 years: Relative risk 0.97 (0.88-1.07).
- >60 years: Relative risk 1.06 (1.01-1.10).
- Limitations: Age cutoff arbitrary and based on trial-wide mean age rather than individual-patient data, thus between-age difference could merely be due to chance or methodological differences between trials.
- 2014 meta-analysis found largely consistent results between atenolol and other beta-blockers versus other antihypertensives.6
- Guidelines recommend against beta-blockers as 1st-line therapy for uncomplicated hypertension in general (UK7) or specifically in patients >60 years (Canada8), unless there are comorbid conditions which benefit from beta-blockers.
- Beta-blockers are highly effective agents in patients with other indications (such as post-myocardial infarction9 or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction10).