Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#262 Who let the Gout Out? Targeting Uric Acid Levels in Treating Gout


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
To prevent gout recurrence, should we dose urate lowering therapies (like allopurinol) to target uric acid levels?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Best evidence finds that increasing doses of allopurinol to achieve a specific serum urate target (example <360 μmol/L) does not reduce gout flares, pain, or function, compared to standard allopurinol dosing. Febuxostat increases cardiovascular and overall mortality and should not be used in most patients with gout.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
One randomized, controlled trial (RCT) evaluated 183 patients on allopurinol (mean dose ~270 mg/day) for gout with persistently elevated serum urate levels (mean 430 μmol/L) and more than 3 flares in the past year.1 Randomized to escalating allopurinol dose to achieve a target serum urate of <360 μmol/L or continue their current allopurinol dose. After 12 months: 
  • Mean daily allopurinol dose: 390 mg intervention, 290 mg control. 
  • ≥ 1 gout flare: 54% intervention, 59% control: not statically different. 
    • Intervention group achieved serum urate <360 μmol/L more often: 69% versus 32%. 
  • Tophi resolution, functional status, pain: no difference.
  • No difference in serious adverse events, rash, or gastrointestinal complaints. 
One systematic review found: 
  • 10 RCTs (6100 patients) of urate lowering therapies reported no relationship between patients achieving serum urate <360 μmol/L and gout flare risk.2 
  • Cohort studies of urate lowering therapies found an association between fewer gout flares and: 
    • An increased length of time a patient is on urate lowering therapies. 
    • Serum urate levels <360 μmol/L. 
Context: 
  • Most guidelines3 recommend a “treat to target” strategy for serum urate levels, while a recent guideline4 concludes insufficient evidence to recommend “treat to target.”
  • Compared to allopurinol, febuxostat increases: 
    • The proportion of gout flares (at up to one year):5 44% febuxostat versus 38% allopurinol; number needed to harm (NNH)=19. 
    • Cardiovascular death:6 4.3% versus 3.2% allopurinol, NNH=91. 
    • All-cause mortality:6 7.8% versus 6.4% allopurinol, NNH=72. 
      • Health Canada warns against febuxostat use in patients with cardiovascular disease.7 
  • Starting allopurinol and colchicine concurrently during a gout flare does not prolong or worsen flare.8 


Gilbert Bretecher June 6, 2023

lowering uric acid to target not necessary

Przemyslaw Bekasiak November 12, 2024

weight reduction


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#378 Tony Romo-sozumab: Winning touchdown in osteoporosis or interception for the loss?

What is the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#377 How to slow the flow IV: Combined oral contraceptives

In premenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding due to benign etiology, do combined oral contraceptives (COC) improve patient outcomes?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#376 Testosterone supplementation for cis-gender men: Let’s (andro-)pause for a moment (Update)

What are the benefits and harms of testosterone supplementation in healthy cis-gender men or those with age-related low testosterone?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Joey Ton PharmD
  • Michael R Kolber MD CCFP MSc

1. Stamp LK, Chapman PT, Barclay ML, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Sep; 76(9):1522-1528.

2. Stamp L, Morillon MB, Taylor WJ, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Oct; 48(2):293-301.

3. Li Q, Li X, Wang J, et al. BMJ open. 2019; 9(8):e026677.

4. Qaseem A, Harris RP, Forciea MA, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jan 3; 166(1):58-68.

5. Faruque LI, Ehteshami-Afshar A, Wiebe N, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013; 43:367-75.

6. White WB, Saag KG, Becker MA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 29; 378(13):1200-1210.

7. Health Canada. Available at: https://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2019/71511a-eng.php. Last Accessed: March 26, 2020.

8. Hill EM, Sky K, Sit M, et al. J Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Apr; 21(3):120-5.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.