Credits Earned (2025) Crédits obtenus

Redeem Prepaid Membership

Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#142 The Low FODMAP Diet: Food for thought or just an irritable idea?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
Does the low FODMAP diet improve symptoms for patients with irritable bowel syndrome?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
A low FODMAP diet may improve symptoms for patients with primarily diarrhea subtype irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, most studies were low quality (small numbers and short duration), and therefore more high quality studies are needed.  



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
Four meta-analyses1-4 (4-8 randomized controlled trials293-596 participants, ROME II/III entry criteria), mainly young females. Compared with control, low FODMAP diet improved:  
  • Symptoms of abdominal pain1-3 and bloating1-2 
  • Quality of life - small to moderate effect3 
  • Global IBS symptoms4: 28% had ongoing symptoms vs 59% control, NNT 4 
  • Severity of symptoms2 
  • Limitations: short follow-up (range: 10 days – 3months); small number of trials.  Poor use of statistics (eg. odds ratios (without event rates) and/or standard mean differences) limit clinical interpretation of data. 
A systematic review assessed the quality of RCTs of LFD for IBS (9 trials, 542 patients) and found all trials were at high risk of biasoften due to lack of blinding and choice of control group;5  Example of actual symptom changes: Largest, high-quality, 6-week, open-label RCT of 123 Danish IBS patients, under specialist care.6 
  • 500-point symptom scale (minimal clinically important difference=50):7 
    • Low FODMAP diet improved ~150 points, probiotic ~80normal diet ~30 points. 
  • Sub-group analysis: Only diarrhea patients improved.  
  • Limitations: Pre-enrollment investigationscolonoscopy, genetic lactase deficiency testingper-protocol analysis. 

CONTEXT
CONTEXTE
  • Cohort studies demonstrate LFD benefit2,8 but IBS patients have high placebo response rate9 (even when told getting placebo).10  
  • IBS guidelines suggest offering patients a low Fodmap diet trial.11,12 Adherence to the diet13 is approximately 40%. 
  • Patients who initially improve on LFD, worsen with reintroduction of fructose or fructans.14  
  • Low FODMAP diet is restrictive, limiting many fruits, dairy products, wheat, legumes, and artificial sweeteners.15 Examples available online.15 


ROBERT BRADSTOCK March 1, 2025

this type of diet is restrictive and may interfere with proper nutrition.


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#403 A Whiff of Prevention: Treating Male Partners to Reduce Bacterial Vaginosis Recurrence

Does treating male sexual partners of females undergoing treatment for bacterial vaginosis infection decrease recurrence?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#402 Nipple Confusion or Nonsense? Pacifiers and Breastfeeding Duration

In term infants, does restricting early use of pacifiers result in higher rates of breastfeeding up to 6 months of age?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#401 Vape Expectations: Are electronic cigarettes the real deal for smoking cessation? (Update)

Are nicotine-containing e-cigarettes more effective than other available options for smoking cessation?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Cian Hackett BSc MD
  • Michael R Kolber BSc MD CCFP MSc

1. Altobelli, E, Del Negro V, Angeletti P, et al. Nutrients. 2017; 9: 940.

2. Marsh A, Eslick EM, Eslick GD. Eur J Nutr. 2016; 55: 897.

3. Schumann D, Klose P, Lauche R, et al. Nutrition. 2018; 45: 24.

4. Dionne J, Ford AC, Yuan Y, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: 1290.

5. Krogsgaard LR, Lyngesen M, Bytzer P. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017; 45(12): 1506-13.

6. Pedersen N, Andersen NN, Végh Z, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(43):16215-26.

7. Francis CY, Morris J, Whorwell PJ. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997; 11:395-402.

8. Rao SCC, Yu S, Fedew A. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 41:1256-70.

9. Ford AC, Moayyedi P. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010; 32:144-58.

10. Kaptchuk TJ, Friedlander E, Kelley JM, et al. PLoS One. 2010; (12):e15591.

11. Ford AC, Moayyedi P, Chey WD, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113 (Suppl 2): 1-18.

12. Moayyedi P, Andrews CN, MacQueen G, et al. J Can Assoc Gastrenterol. 2019; 2(1): 6-29.

13. Mari A, Hosadurg D, Martin L, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 31(2): 178-182.

14. Shepherd SJ, Parker FC, Muir JG, et al. Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2008; 6:765-71.

15. Low Fodmap Diet. https://stanfordhealthcare.org/medical-treatments/l/low-fodmapdiet.html Accessed Oct 3, 2019

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.

Most recent review: 26/11/2019

By: Samantha Moe Pharm D, Michael R Kolber BSc MD CCFP, Mike Allan BSc MD CCFP

Comments:

  • Evidence update: Addition of five systematic reviews
  • Bottom Line: Minor changes incorporating results from systematic reviews

Learning at a glance
Yearly credits
Acquired ()
Your content by topic
Cardiology Dermatology Emergency
My Bookmarks