Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#158 Is less more with isotretinoin and acne?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
What is the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose compared to conventional dose isotretinoin in the treatment of acne?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Small randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies demonstrate low-dose (~20mg/day) isotretinoin improves acne similar to conventional dosing. Low-dose may reduce common side effects (chapped lips, dry skin, epistaxis) by 16-35% but may be associated with increased relapse rates, particularly with severe acne and/or possibly impacted by lower total accumulated dose.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
  • Three RCTs compare conventional to low dosing:
    • 60 moderate acne patients, low (0.25-0.4 mg/kg/day) or “conventional” dosing (0.5-0.7 mg/kg/day) for 24 weeks.1 Low-dose demonstrated:
      • Equivalent efficacy (acne grading and lesion counts).
      • Increased patient satisfaction (76% very satisfied versus 31%).
      • Higher (non-significant) one year relapse rate: 18% versus 13%.
    • 150 severe treatment resistant nodulocystic acne patients, 0.1 mg/kg/day, 0.5 mg/kg/day or 1.0 mg/kg/day for 20 weeks.2
      • Equivalent improvement with all doses.
      • Eighteen month relapse rates, from lowest-highest doses: 42%, 20%, and 10%.
    • Both studies reported 16-35% fewer common side effects (chapped lips, dry skin, and epistaxis) with lower doses.1,2
    • 120 mild-severe acne patients, high (1 mg/kg/day) or low-dose (20 mg/day) alternating days for 16 weeks.3 Low-dose:
      • Decrease in acne load 81% versus 95%.
      • Fewer side effects.
  • Large prospective study (638 moderate acne patients, 20 mg/day for 24 weeks) reported “good results” in ~94% of patients, decreased incidence of side effects and 5% relapse at four years.4
  • Smaller observational studies of ~20mg/day support these findings.5,6,7 Two report improved outcomes with a 120 mg/kg total cumulative dose.5,7
CONTEXT:
  • FDA approved isotretinoin in 1982 for the treatment of severe acne in patients ≥12 years old. The recommended dosage is 0.5-1 mg/kg divided into two doses daily for 4-5 months.8
  • Many lower-dose studies do not reach a similar total accumulated dose as the higher dose treatment arm(s), which may partly explain higher relapse rates.1-3
  • Recommended laboratory monitoring includes triglycerides, cholesterol, transaminase, and complete blood counts.9,10
  • Although there are reports of mood changes, suicidal ideation and suicide, no causal relationship is proven.9,10
  • Isotretinoin is teratogenic and pregnancy must be prevented one month before, during, and after treatment.9,10


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#379 Bumpin’ Up the Protection? RSV Vaccine in Pregnancy

How effective and safe is the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine (AbrysvoTM) when given during pregnancy?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#378 Tony Romo-sozumab: Winning touchdown in osteoporosis or interception for the loss?

What is the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#377 How to slow the flow IV: Combined oral contraceptives

In premenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding due to benign etiology, do combined oral contraceptives (COC) improve patient outcomes?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Christina Korownyk MD CCFP
  • Kirti Brar MD CCFP

1. Lee JW, Yoo KH, Park KY. Br J Dermatol. 2011; 164:1369-75.

2. Strauss JS, Rapini RP, Shalita AR, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984; 10:490-6.

3. Agarwal US, Besarwal RK, Bhola K. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011; 77:688-94.

4. Amichai B, Shemer A, Grunwald MH. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006; 54:644-6.

5. Rasi A, Behrangi E, Rohaninasab M, et al. Adv Biomed Res. 2014; 3:103.

6. Merita Grajqevci K. Med Arh. 2015; 69: 28-30.

7. Mandekou-Lefaki I, Delli F, Teknetzis A, et al. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 2003; 23:41-6.

8. Roche. Product Monograph. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2002/18662s043lbl.pdf. Last accessed January 25, 2016.

9. Goldsmith LA, Bolognia JL, Callen JP, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004; 50:900-6.

10. Strauss JS, Krowchuk DP, Leyden JJ. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007; 56:651-63.

Authors do not have any conflicts to disclose.