Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#161 Docusate: A Placebo Pill for Soft Poops


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
Is docusate effective in the prevention and treatment of constipation?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Docusate appears similar to placebo in increasing stool frequency and is inferior to other products for treating functional, medication-induced, or post-operative constipation.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
  • Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of both brands, docusate sodium (Colace™) and docusate calcium (Surfak™).  
    • In functional or medication-induced constipation versus placebo: 
      • 74 Palliative care patients (91% on opioids) on daily sennareceived docusate or placebo.1 Over 10 days: 
        • No difference in daily bowel motions (BMs) or sense of complete evacuation. 
      • 74 hospitalized patients (immobilized or semi-ambulatory) in cross-over RCT received docusate or placebo.2 Over 30 days: 
        • Docusate increased weekly BM by ~1/week. 
        • No change in patient satisfaction. 
        • Limitations: 26% lost to follow-up, statistics not performed, and study 60 years old. 
      • Docusate sodium versus docusate calcium compared to placebo: Three week RCT in 46 elderly (mean age 82 years) institutionalized patients.3  
        • Neither significantly changed number of weekly BMs (our calculation as misleading statistics reported). 
      • Other placebo-controlled RCTs limited by: 
        • Enrolled inappropriate patients (example comatose).4  
        • Randomization not described5,6 or incorrect (flipping coin).4  
        • Patients and/or outcome assessors not likely blinded.4,5  
        • Selective reporting on sub-group of patients.5,6  
    • In functional or medication-induced constipation versus active comparator: 
      • Docusate sodium versupsyllium: RCT of 170 patients (mean age 37 years, 92% females) over two weeks:7 
        • Weekly BMs: Increased with psyllium (0.5/week), docusate no change. 
    • Post-operative patients:  
      • Senna and docusate versus: 
        • Placebo: First BM ~1 day sooner8 with senna and docusate but benefit possibly due to senna 
        • Polyethylene glycol (PEG): First BM 1-2 days sooner with PEG.9 
    • Pregnant/post-partum patients:  
      • No RCTs on docusate alone.10,11 
Context: 
  • Constipation affects 12-19% of North American adults, most commonly children, elderly, and females.12 
  • Despite widespread prevalence, most constipation studies limited by small numbers and short study periods 
  • Docusate use may be low (~6%) in primary care patients13 but stool softner use more common (26%) in nursing home patients.14 
  • For comparison, osmotic agents increase BMs in adults and children by ~2-3 per week.15 


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#359 Topical corticosteroids for atopic dermatitis - More than skin deep

What are the benefits/harms of topical corticosteroids for atopic dermatitis in adults/children?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#358: Any berry good solutions to preventing UTIs: Cranberries?

Do cranberry products prevent recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs)?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#357: Overcoming Resistance: Antipsychotics for difficult to treat depression

In patients with treatment-resistant depression, is adding an atypical antipsychotic to current therapy safe and effective?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Jenny Carbon BScPharm PharmD Student
  • Michael Kolber BSc MD CCFP MSc

1. Tarumi Y, Wilson MP, Szafran O, et al. J Pain and Symptom Manage. 2013; 45(1):2-13.

2. Cass LJ, Frederik WS. Am J Gastroneterol. 1956; 26(6):691-8.

3. Fain AM, Susat R, Herring M, et al. South Med J. 1978; 71(6):677-80.

4. Goodman J, Pang J, Bessman AN. J Chron Dis. 1976; 29(1):59-63.

5. Castle SC, Cantrell M, Israel D, et al. Geriatrics. 1991; 46(11):84-6.

6. Hyland CM, Foran JD. Practitioner. 1968; 200(199):698-9.

7. McRorie JW, Daggy BP, Morel JG, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998; 12(5):491-7.

8. Patel M, Schimpf MO, O’Sullivan DM, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202(5):479.e1-5.

9. Madsen L, Major C, Parker BA. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2010; 14(2):75-81.

10. Rungsiprakarn P, Laopaiboon M, Sangkomkamhang US, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD011448.

11. Turawa EB, Musekiwa A, Rohwer AC. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 9:CD010273.

12. Higgins PDR, Johanson JF. Am J Gastro. 2004; 99:750-9.

13. Shafe ACE, Lee S, Dalrymple JSO, et al. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2011; 4(6):343-63.

14. Phillips C, Polakoff DM, Maue SK, et al. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2001; 2:149-54.

15. Allan GM, Levy M, Kolber MR. Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) for Paediatric and Adult Chronic Constipation. Internet publication. Available at: https://www.acfp.ca/wp-content/uploads/tools-for-practice/1429563797_updatedtfp45pegandchronicconstipationfv.pdf. Last accessed February 3, 2016.

Authors do not have any conflicts to disclose.