Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#259 Unmasking the evidence around masks for healthcare workers


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
Is there a difference between mask types in preventing viral respiratory infections for healthcare workers?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
In healthcare workers;
  • Surgical masks and respirators (N95) appear to provide similar protection against viral infections, with N95 masks having slightly lower, but not statistically different, infection rates in the wearer (~1-2%).
  • Cloth masks are less effective than surgical masks (with ~2% more respiratory infections in 4 weeks).
  • No randomized controlled trials examined transmission from healthcare workers to others and none examined COVID-19.
  • Masks are just one-part of Personal Protective Equipment and transmission precautions.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
Evidence:  N95 masks (also called respirators) compared to surgical masks (also called medical) in preventing a wide range of viral respiratory tract infections: 4 systematic reviews with 3-6 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and 3016-9171 patients (95-100% healthcare workers). Most RCTs 5 weeks, largest 12 weeks.1-4 
  • Largest Meta-Analysis:1 
Healthcare worker condition  N95 Masks  Surgical Masks  Statistical Difference 
Confirmed Influenza  5.9%  6.3%  No 
Confirmed Viral Respiratory Tract Infection  5.7%  8.3%  No 
Influenza-like Illness   3.4%  5.0%  No 
 
  • Other Systematic Reviews found similar.2-4 
    • One RCT (1441 healthcare workers) examined fit-tested N95 versus nonfit-tested N95: No difference.5   
  • Issues: Multiple outcomes, not Covid-19, overall low risk of infection, intervention only used during working hours, did not examine healthcare workers transfer to patients, other staff or family.  
Cloth masks versus surgical masks: One RCT in 1607 healthcare workers in Vietnam for 4 weeks.6 Viral infections in the wearer: 
  • Clinical Respiratory Infections: 7.6% cloth versus 4.8% surgical masks (borderline statistically different).  
  • Influenza-like Illness: 2.3% cloth versus 0.2% surgical masks (statistically different). 
  • Laboratory confirmed viral infection: 5.5% cloth versus 3.3% surgical mask (not statistically different). 
Experimental studies: 
  • In general, when blocking particles/droplets/microorganisms, N95 are slightly better than surgical masks which are better than cloth masks (which get better with thicker cloth/layers).4,7,8  
Context: 
  • Masks, compared to no masks, do help prevent infections (example ~3.5% reduction in clinical respiratory infections in RCTs).3,9 
  • Wearing a mask might prevent infected healthcare workers, including asymptomatic individuals, from transmitting the disease to others.  
  • Masks should not be considered as an isolated intervention and should always be used with other measures such as hand hygiene and depending on interaction and patients seen, eye protection, face shields and gowns.  
  • Public use of masks will be reviewed in an upcoming Tools for Practice. 


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#367 Oral Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Antagonists: A painfully long name for the acute treatment of migraines

What are the risks and benefits of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of episodic migraines?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#366 Looking for Closure: Managing simple excisions or wounds efficiently

What are some options for efficiency in wound closure?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#365 Shrooms for Glooms: Evidence for psilocybin for depression

What are the benefits and harms of psilocybin for treatment-resistant/recurrent depression?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Nicolas Dugré PharmD MSc BCPAC
  • G. Michael Allan MD CCFP

1. Long Y, Hu T, Liu L, et al. J Evid Based Med. 2020 Mar 13. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12381.

2. Bartoszko JJ, Farooqi MAM, Alhazzani W, et al. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2020 Apr 4. doi: 10.1111/irv.12745.

3. Offeddu V, Yung CF, Low MSF, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 13; 65:1934-42.

4. Smith JD, MacDougall CC, Johnstone J, et al. CMAJ. 2016; 188:567-74.

5. MacIntyre CR, Wang Q, Cauchemez S, et al. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2011 May; 5(3):170-9.

6. MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, et al. BMJ Open. 2015; 5: e006577. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2014-006577

7. Ma QX, Shan H, Zhang HL, et al. J Med Virol. 2020 Mar 31. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25805.

8. Davies A, Thompson K, Giri K, et al. Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2013; 7:413-418.

9. Bin-Reza F, Lopez Chavarrias V, Nicoll A, et al. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2012; 6:257-67.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.