#305 PEER’s Guide to Gift-Giving
Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits
Join NowAlready a CFPCLearn Member? Log in
- Fancy versus practical gift:
- 189 participants rated preferences for “luxury” or “practical” pen;1 scale (1=very little to 7=very much).
- Participants receiving practical pen:
- Liked it more (score: 4.9 versus 4.4), felt happier (4.8 versus 3.9); all comparisons statistically different.
- Limitation: No comparison to any other gift.
- Participants receiving practical pen:
- 189 participants rated preferences for “luxury” or “practical” pen;1 scale (1=very little to 7=very much).
- More versus less expensive gift:
- 197 participants: more expensive (iPod) and less expensive (CD) gifts similarly appreciated [score: 6.0 on 7-point scale (higher=greater appreciation)].2
- Limitation: Both gifts now obsolete.
- 197 participants: more expensive (iPod) and less expensive (CD) gifts similarly appreciated [score: 6.0 on 7-point scale (higher=greater appreciation)].2
- Sentimental gifts:
- 330 participants, 86% preferred sentimental gift (photo of gift-giver and recipient) over “preference-matched gift” (framed photo of favourite musician).3
- Limitation: Photos of musicians may be suboptimal comparator.
- 330 participants, 86% preferred sentimental gift (photo of gift-giver and recipient) over “preference-matched gift” (framed photo of favourite musician).3
- Gift timing:
- 181 students rated importance of on-time birthday gift.4
- Scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree).
- Timing unimportant: Mean rating=4.7
- Limitations: Unclear how late gift would be (i.e., days versus months).
- Timing unimportant: Mean rating=4.7
- Scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree).
- 181 students rated importance of on-time birthday gift.4
- Wish-lists:
- 90 students, recipient’s satisfaction score higher with registry gift: 8.6 versus 6.8 (non-registered gift) on 10-point scale (higher=better), statistically different.5
- Limitations: the gifts utilized were all lamps.
- 90 students, recipient’s satisfaction score higher with registry gift: 8.6 versus 6.8 (non-registered gift) on 10-point scale (higher=better), statistically different.5
- Improving bad gifts:
- 616 participants rated gift with/without notecard indicating: “I hope you like [this gift] -- I got myself [one] too!”.6
- Some gifts (examples: cookbook, mug, socks) had improved “likeability, thoughtfulness and consideration” score (>0.5 points on 7-point scale) with notecard.
- Others (examples: flashlight, stapler) no change.
- Some gifts (examples: cookbook, mug, socks) had improved “likeability, thoughtfulness and consideration” score (>0.5 points on 7-point scale) with notecard.
- 616 participants rated gift with/without notecard indicating: “I hope you like [this gift] -- I got myself [one] too!”.6
- No studies describing opinions of people receiving “regifted” items.
- Original givers prefer their gifts be regifted versus thrown away.7
- The Seinfeld cast give opinions in this segment.
- Example desirable gifts from studies: Restaurant gift cards5, movie tickets5, blanket6, headphones6, and bourbon6.
Thank you for your research. Probably I’ll just hope for bourbon regifted.
interesting
Very useful research. Will remember that I’ll need to attach more than a notecard to jazz up a stapler. Perhaps a bottle of bourbon?