Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#306 Top 5 Tools for Practice of 2021


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
What are the Top Tools for Practice in 2021?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
1. How does once daily iron dosing compare with dosing every second day or twice weekly? Bottom Line: Once daily dosing of iron yields similar or slightly better hemoglobin (~3 g/L) versus twice weekly or alternate day over ~3 months. Daily dosing increased ferritin similarly or up to 12 μg/L better. Adverse events (like abdominal pain) are reduced by up to 30% (absolute) with intermittent dosing. Research focused on females aged 14-22.   2. Is semaglutide effective for weight loss?   Bottom Line: Used with lifestyle changes, 2.4mg weekly subcutaneous semaglutide resulted in an average 10-15% loss in weight (10-15kg) over 68 weeks versus 2-3% (3-4kg) with placebo. Most (70-80%) semaglutide participants lost 5% or more of their body weight. About ¾ of patients experience gastrointestinal side effects, but few stop. Weight regain occurs once the medication is stopped. 3. What is the role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction? Bottom Line: SGLT2i reduce mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, and improve quality of life when added to other medications in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, with or without diabetes. For every 100 patients treated with an SGLT2i for ~1.5 years, ~2 fewer will die, ~4 fewer will be hospitalized for heart failure, and ~7 more will have improved quality of life compared to placebo. 4. Is colchicine effective for secondary cardiovascular prevention? Bottom Line: Daily low-dose colchicine in people with coronary artery disease lowers the risk of cardiovascular events by ~1%/year (relative risk reduction 25-30%) but increases the risk of gastrointestinal events (mostly diarrhea) by ~2% and has no effect on mortality. 5. In premenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding without pathological cause, do nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) improve patient outcomes? Bottom Line: Based on low-quality evidence, NSAIDs reduce relative mean menstrual blood loss by ~30%, and ~20-50% fewer sanitary products used than placebo. Effects on bleeding duration are inconsistent.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session





Judith Kazimirski January 12, 2022

reinforced use of Ansaids for menstrual pain as well

Judith Kazimirski January 12, 2022

reinforced use of Ansaids for menstrual pain as well – reinforced my knowledge of iron supplmenttion

Judith Kazimirski January 12, 2022

reinforced use of Ansaids for menstrual pain as well – reinforced my knowledge of iron supplmenttion it is worth repeating


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#363 Making a difference in indifference? Medications for apathy in dementia

In patients with dementia, how safe and effective are stimulants, antidepressants, and antipsychotics for treating apathy?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#362 Facing the Evidence in Acne, Part I: Oral contraceptives and spironolactone in females

How effective are combined oral contraceptives (COC) and spironolactone for treating acne of at least mild-moderate severity in females?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#361 Preventing RSV Infections in Infants

How safe and effective are monoclonal antibodies to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections in infants?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • PEER Team

1. Lee H, Poon MC, Allan GM. Iron dosing frequency: is less more or just less? Tools for Practice #284 online publication. Available at: https://gomainpro.ca/wp-content/uploads/tools-for-practice/1613773166_tfp284irondosingfv.pdf Accessed November 8, 2021.

2. Ojeniran M, Dube B, Paige A, et al. Mission slimpossible: semaglutide for weight loss. Tools for Practice #295 online publication. Published July 27, 2021. Available at: https://gomainpro.ca/wp-content/uploads/tools-for-practice/1627498844_tfp295_semaglutidealupdated.pdf Accessed November 8, 2021

3. Falk J, Potter J, Turgeon RD. Should a ‘flozin be chosen to play a part for a failing heart? Tools for Practice #285 online publication. Published March 8, 2021. Available at: https://gomainpro.ca/wp-content/uploads/tools-for-practice/1615826416_tfpsglt2ifv.pdf Accessed November 8, 2021.

4. Dugré N, Vanier S, Turgeon RD. Cardiovascular prevention trials: now calling colchicine to the stand. Tools for Practice #299 online publication. Published October 4, 2021. Available at: https://gomainpro.ca/wp-content/uploads/tools-for-practice/1633359097_tfp299_colchicine.pdf Accessed November 8, 2021

5. Potter J, Sari Z, Lindblad AJ. How to slow the flow: NSAIDs for heavy menstrual bleeding. Tools for Practice #287 online publication. Published April 6, 2021. Available at: https://gomainpro.ca/wp-content/uploads/tools-for-practice/1617301202_tfp287_hmbfv.pdf Accessed November 8, 2021

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.