Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique

#326 Scary Noises: Reducing death rattle at the end of life

Can medications reduce the incidence of terminal respiratory secretions (death rattle) at the end of life?

Best evidence supports prophylactic administration of scopolamine butylbromide (Buscopan™, hyoscine butylbromide) in patients who are close to death but without death rattle, reducing the number who develop death rattle [13% versus 27% (placebo)]. Evidence supporting treatment of death rattle once it has begun is less clear with no evidence that one antimuscarinic is clearly superior to another or perhaps placebo. There is no evidence that treatment of death rattle improves patient comfort. It may, however, reduce the distress of people at bedside. the decision whether to treat should be guided by conversations with family or caregivers. 

CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session

  • One double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT),1 162 hospice patients in the dying phase (as per multidisciplinary team), without death rattle, given scopolamine butylbromide 20mg subcutaneously four times daily or placebo.
    • Development of death rattle (score 2 or 3 on 3-point scale, higher=worse) at any point prior to death: 13% versus 27% (placebo); number needed to treat (NNT)=8.
    • Adverse events (including restlessness, dry mouth, or urinary retention): No difference.
  • One non-blinded RCT,2 132 adults close to death but without death rattle examined prophylaxis versus treatment at onset of death rattle with scopolamine butylbromide 20mg subcutaneously, then 60mg/24 hours.
    • 48% of patients suffered death rattle if treatment initiated once symptoms present, versus 6% of patients for whom treatment was initiated prior to symptom onset.
Treatment once death rattle present:
  • Four systematic reviews3-6 of five RCTs (10-333 participants).
    • Three RCTs: No difference between scopolamine hydrobromide and either atropine (1 RCT, 333 patients) or octreotide (1 RCT, 10 patients). Unclear difference between scopolamine hydrobromide and glycopyrronium (1 RCT, 13 patients).
    • Two RCTs: No difference between placebo and either atropine (1 RCT, 160 patients), or scopolamine hydrobromide (1 RCT, 31 patients).
  • Death rattle is defined as noisy breathing caused by the presence of mucus in the upper respiratory tract.
    • Occurs in 12%-80% of patients in last 3 days of life.7
    • It may not distress patients, however, may be distressing to family and caregivers.1
  • Non-pharmacologic measures include repositioning although evidence to support this is lacking.5
  • Scopolamine butylbromide (Buscopan®) is available subcutaneously or orally in Canada.
    • Scopolamine hydrobromide is different and can cause central nervous system effects.8

Lisa Vasil October 31, 2022

So glad to see the evidence for this. I will do this with my next palliative patient

Lisa Vasil October 31, 2022

I will try prophylactic buscopan with my next palliative patient

Derek Robinson October 31, 2022

Nice and straight forward

Stacy Davies October 31, 2022

Helpful for my palliative care practice

STEPHANIE OMOIFO November 1, 2022

i agree with giving the scopolamine

Amy Pawson November 1, 2022

very helpful

Gilbert Bretecher November 5, 2022

helpful to know that scopolamine does probably help

Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#370 Antibiotics or no antibiotics for acute diverticulitis, that is the question!

Do antibiotics change clinical outcomes for patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#369 Remind me, do medications that target brain amyloid improve my dementia?

Are amyloid-targeting monoclonal antibodies safe and effective for mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s dementia?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#368 Sodium Restriction in Heart Failure: Beneficial or pouring salt in the wound?

Does sodium restriction improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session

  • Jennifer Potter MD CCFP
  • Christina Korownyk MD CCFP

1. van Esch HJ, van Zuylen L, Geijteman T, et al. JAMA. 2021; 326(13):1268-1276

2. Mercadante S, Marinangeli F, Masedu F, et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;56(6):902-907.

3. Jansen K, Haugen DF, Pont L, et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;55(2):508-521.

4. Kolb H, Snowden A, Stevens E. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74:1446-1462.

5. Lokker ME, van Zuylen L, van der Rijt CC, et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;47(1):105-120.

6. Wee B, Hillier R. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; CD005177.

7. Crawford GB, Dzierżanowski T, Hauser K, et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee. ESMO Open. 2021; 6(4):100225.

8. Bennett M, Lucas V, Brennan M, et al. Palliat Med. 2002;16:369-374.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.