Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#387 Side effects of long-term PPI use: Leaving a bad taste in your mouth?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
What are the side effects of long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Best evidence from large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials suggest PPIs do not increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, fractures, or pneumonia.  Observational studies suggest PPIs may be associated with vitamin B12 and magnesium deficiency. 



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
  • Focusing on large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of observational studies where RCT outcomes not unavailable.
  • RCTs:
    • 17,598 patients with cardiovascular disease, randomized to pantoprazole or placebo.1 At ~3 years, no statistical difference between PPI or placebo, including:
      • All-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, fractures, pneumonia, clostridium difficile infection, chronic kidney disease, dementia, or gastrointestinal malignancies.
    • 3761 patients with cardiovascular disease on aspirin, randomized to clopidogrel plus omeprazole or clopidogrel plus placebo.2 Trial ended prematurely when sponsor declared bankruptcy. Outcomes at 180 days:
      • All-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, fractures and pneumonia: No difference.
      • Upper gastrointestinal events (examples: bleeding, ulcer): 1.1% omeprazole versus 2.9% placebo, statistically different.
  • Observational studies:
    • Observational studies of the above outcomes have inconsistent findings.3-6
    • Best systematic reviews of observational studies on vitamin B12 and magnesium deficiency (no RCT evidence available):
      • Vitamin B12 deficiency: increased risk in case-controlled and cohorts.7
        • Largest, high quality North American case-control study:8 Vitamin B12 deficient patients more likely to be on PPIs, Odds Ratio (OR): 1.65, statistically different.
      • Hypomagnesiemia: Increased risk, OR: 1.71, statistically different.9
    • Limitations: Observational studies cannot determine causation. Other patient factors may explain associations.

CONTEXT
CONTEXTE
  • Patients on PPIs should have indication reviewed periodically.10
    • Many patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) use PPIs, including as needed.11
    • Lowering dose or discontinuation could be considered for some; tapering may help.12,13
  • Continuing PPIs may be appropriate in patients with:14
    • Barrett’s or eosinophilic esophagus,
    • Erosive esophagitis or GERD related complications (example: stricture), or
    • Previous gastrointestinal bleed or ulcer where gastroprotection is needed.
  • All PPIs have similar efficacy: Cost and individual response should guide prescribing.15
  • Overall, vitamin B12 deficiency occurs in ~5% of patients >60 years.16
    • If PPI association is true, the new risk of vitamin B12 deficiency would be ~8%.


Tamar Tsafnat April 12, 2025

consider B12 levels if on PPI long term

Brian McDermid April 15, 2025

Review B 12 levels annually and supplement as necessary.

nivin Azer April 16, 2025

very useful

nivin Azer April 16, 2025

I AGREE USEFUL TO MY PRACTICE

Robert Ramsey April 16, 2025

weak data, not terrible SE

Raphael Peladeau April 29, 2025

To follow up on B12, is it really necessary to check levels if the patient is asymptomatic? Is supplementation useful in the asymptomatic patient? Not clear

Michael Fitzgerald April 30, 2025

I review B12 levels yearly in patients on long term PPI

CFPC Admin May 6, 2025

Posted on behalf of the authors: In the tool, we do not explicitly state that practitioners should check VB12 levels – but leave up to practitioners. Consideration of testing would depend on the clinical circumstance (patient age, other comorbidities, length of PPI use…) and whether or not they have any clinical outcomes of B12 deficiency (for example: anemia, peripheral symptoms or cognitive changes).

Whether treating VB12 deficiency patients depends on clinical circumstances – symptomatic or not, lab values and other clinical clues.

David Lounsbury May 16, 2025

reassuring

Rebecca Lubitz May 17, 2025

I have had a few cases of low B12 in patients on long term PPIs … hard to know if causal, but certainly worth considering based on this.

Jennifer MacDonald May 19, 2025

Confusing data as this goes somewhat against the Choosing Wisely campaign

Ken Jaskolka May 19, 2025

Periodically check B12 and magnesium levels in patients on chronic PPI use.

Rohit Chadha May 20, 2025

good info

Abu Arif May 27, 2025

GOOD TO KNOW

katharine storkson June 3, 2025

I can see this, similarly, magnesium levels have tended to normalize after D/C PPI’s and return to low levels once started

ZAHID AHMAD June 4, 2025

wondered it is worth to check the intrinsic factor and parietal cell antibodies in patients on long term ppi , and if came back positive then consider alternative to treat dyspepsia as those are very high risk to develop b12 deficiency


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#392 Mission Slimpossible, Part 3: Tirzepatide for weight loss

Is tirzepatide effective for weight loss?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#391 Trying Tongue-Tie Treatment: Does Frenotomy Fix Feeding Frustrations?

Does surgical frenotomy in infants with ankyloglossia (tongue-tie) improve mother or infant breastfeeding outcomes?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#390 Use the soft touch for buckle fractures?

Is rigid immobilization needed in buckle fractures?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Allison Paige MD CCFP
  • Michael R Kolber MD CCFP MSc

1. Moayyedi P, Eikelboom JW, Bosch Ji, et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Sep;157(3):682-691.e2.

2. Bhatt DL, Cryer BL, Contant CF, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 11;363(20):1909-17.

3. Islam MM, Poly TN, Walther BA, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec;30(12):1395-1405.

4. Shin GY, Myung Park J, Hong J, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 1;116:1211–1219.

5. Abrahami D, McDonald E, Schnitzer ME, et al. Gut. 2022;71:16–24.

6. Friesen KJ, Falk J, Chateau D et al. Clinical Pharm Ther. 2023; Jan;113 (1):152-159.

7. Choudhury A, Jena A, Jearth V, et al. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 May;17(5):479-487.

8. Lam JR, Schneider JL, Zhao W et al. JAMA. 2013 Dec 11;310(22):2435-2442.

9. Srinutta T, Chewcharat A, Takkavatakarn K, et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(44):e17788.

10. Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FS, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1;117:27-56.

11. Nocon M, Labenz J, Jaspersen D, et al. Ailment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Mar 15;25:715-722.

12. Kolber MR, Nickonchuk T. Tools for Practice #190. Available at: https://cfpclearn.ca/tfp190/ Accessed July 15, 2024.

13. RxFiles “Stopping your Proton Pump Inhibitor” Available at: https://www.rxfiles.ca/RxFiles/uploads/documents/Deprescribing-PPI-Patient-Tool.pdf. Accessed Dec 1, 2024.

14. Targownik LE, Fisher DA, Saini SD. Gastroenterology. 2022 Apr;162(4):1334-1342.

15. Alberta College of Family Physicians/PEER team: Price Comparison of Commonly Prescribed Pharmaceuticals in Alberta. Available at: https://pricingdoc.acfp.ca/. Accessed July 30, 2024.

16. Silverstein WK, Cheung MC. CMAJ. 2022;194(24):E843.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.