#72 Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Drug-Eluting Stent Placement: 3 Months, 1 Year or Forever?
Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits
Join NowAlready a CFPCLearn Member? Log in
- One meta-analysis1 (10 RCTs) comparing “longer” versus “shorter” DAPT, statistically significant:
- Decreased risk of:
- Myocardial infarction (MI): -0.8%/year, Number Needed to Treat (NNT)=125.
- Increased risk of:
- All-cause mortality: +0.2%/year, Number Needed to Harm (NNH)=500.
- Major bleed: +0.6%/year, NNH=167.
- Other meta-analyses2-4 found:
- 3-6 versus 12 months:
- Death,2,3 MI/stent thrombosis:2-4 No difference.
- Major bleed: No difference2 or reduction,3,4 NNT=250-385.
- 18-48 versus 6-12 months:
- Death: No difference2,3 or higher risk.4
- MI/stent thrombosis: Reduction.2-4
- Major bleed: Increase.2-4
- 3-6 versus 12 months:
- Decreased risk of:
- 2016 American DAPT guidelines5 recommend:
- Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) +/- stent placement: DAPT >12 months.
- Consider stopping at six months if high bleed risk or develop overt bleed.
- DES placement for stable coronary artery disease: DAPT >6 months.
- At six months, re-assess & consider for longer if low bleed risk.
- Stop after three months if develop bleed.
- Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) +/- stent placement: DAPT >12 months.
- Reduction of “very late” stent thrombosis (one year after DES placement), the primary goal of prolonged DAPT, rarely occurs with newer DES:
- 0.8% with 2nd generation DES versus 3% with paclitaxel-eluting stent (1st generation stent no longer used in practice).6
- In-hospital mortality is <4%7 (previously overestimated as 20-45%8).
- Preliminary clinical predictions rules9,10 (such as the DAPT Score) describe factors to consider shorter/longer duration:
- Longer (increase MI): ACS/MI at presentation, prior MI/revascularization, heart failure or ejection fraction <30%, diabetes and certain stent/procedural factors.
- Shorter (increased bleed): Age, low/high BMI, anemia, and anticoagulation.