Credits Earned (2024) Crédits obtenus

Redeem Prepaid Membership

Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#72 Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Drug-Eluting Stent Placement: 3 Months, 1 Year or Forever?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
In patients with coronary artery disease who have drug-eluting stent (DES) placement, how long should we prescribe dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), such as aspirin plus clopidogrel?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Current evidence shows small reductions in cardiovascular events balanced by a small increase in major bleed and mortality for DAPT duration >12 months. Guidelines recommend >12 months for ACS and >6 months for elective DES placement, with ½ these durations if major bleed occurs. Patient preferences and values should guide DAPT duration.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
Multiple meta-analyses of 11 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), 33,051 patients comparing DAPT durations of 3-48 months following DES placement. 
  • One meta-analysis1 (10 RCTs) comparing “longer” versus “shorter” DAPTstatistically significant:  
    • Decreased risk of: 
      • Myocardial infarction (MI)-0.8%/year, Number Needed to Treat (NNT)=125. 
    • Increased risk of: 
      • All-cause mortality: +0.2%/year, Number Needed to Harm (NNH)=500. 
      • Major bleed: +0.6%/year, NNH=167. 
    • Other meta-analyses2-4 found: 
      • 3-6 versus 12 months:  
        • Death,2,3 MI/stent thrombosis:2-4 No difference. 
        • Major bleed: No difference2 or reduction,3,4 NNT=250-385. 
      • 18-48 versus 6-12 months: 
        • Death: No difference2,3 or higher risk.4 
        • MI/stent thrombosis: Reduction.2-4 
        • Major bleed: Increase.2-4
Context:  
  • 2016 American DAPT guidelines5 recommend: 
    • Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) +/- stent placement: DAPT >12 months. 
      • Consider stopping at six months if high bleed risk or develop overt bleed. 
    • DES placement for stable coronary artery disease: DAPT >6 months. 
      • At six months, re-assess & consider for longer if low bleed risk. 
      • Stop after three months if develop bleed. 
  • Reduction of “very late” stent thrombosis (one year after DES placement)the primary goal of prolonged DAPT, rarely occurs with newer DES: 
    • 0.8% with 2nd generation DES versus 3% with paclitaxel-eluting stent (1st generation stent no longer used in practice).6 
    • In-hospital mortality is <4%7 (previously overestimated as 20-45%8). 
  • Preliminary clinical predictions rules9,10 (such as the DAPT Score) describe factors to consider shorter/longer duration: 
    • Longer (increase MI)ACS/MI at presentation, prior MI/revascularization, heart failure or ejection fraction <30%, diabetes and certain stent/procedural factors. 
    • Shorter (increased bleed): Agelow/high BMI, anemia, and anticoagulation. 
updated july 20 2016 by ricky


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#379 Bumpin’ Up the Protection? RSV Vaccine in Pregnancy

How effective and safe is the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine (AbrysvoTM) when given during pregnancy?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#378 Tony Romo-sozumab: Winning touchdown in osteoporosis or interception for the loss?

What is the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#377 How to slow the flow IV: Combined oral contraceptives

In premenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding due to benign etiology, do combined oral contraceptives (COC) improve patient outcomes?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • G. Michael Allan MD CCFP
  • Ricky D. Turgeon BSc(Pharm) ACPR PharmD

1. Spencer FA, Prasad M, Vandvik PO, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 163:118-26.

2. Bittl JA, Baber U, Bradley SM, et al. Circulation. 2016; 134(10):e156-78.

3. Giustino G, Baber U, Sartori S, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65:1298-310.

4. Navarese EP, Andreotti F, Schulze V, et al. BMJ. 2015; 350:h1618.

5. Levine GN, Bates ER, Brindis RG, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68(10):1082-115.

6. Mauri L, Kereiakes DJ, Yeh RW, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371:2155-66.

7. Kohn CG, Kluger J, Azeem M, et al. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8:e77330.

8. Grines CL, Bonow RO, Casey DE. Circulation. 2007; 115:813-8.

9. Yeh RW, Secemsky EA, Kerelakes DJ, et al. JAMA. 2016; 315:1735-49.

10. Baber U, Mehran R, Giustino G, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67:2224-34.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.

Most recent review: 20/07/2016

By: Ricky D. Turgeon BSc(Pharm) ACPR PharmD

Comments:

Evidence Updated: New evidence, Context; Bottom Line: Changed.

Learning at a glance
Yearly credits
Acquired ()
Your content by topic
Cardiology Dermatology Emergency
My Bookmarks