Credits Earned (2024) Crédits obtenus

Redeem Prepaid Membership

Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#101 NSAIDs and cardiovascular safety: the truth makes my heart hurt


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
Do different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have different cardiovascular risks?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
COX-2 inhibitors and traditional NSAIDs, except naproxen, increase the risk of major vascular events and death. When prescribing NSAIDs, patients’ gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) risk should be assessed, with naproxen or low-dose ibuprofen possibly preferred for patients at risk of CV disease.  



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
Meta-analysis of 754 randomized controlled trials (~350,000 patients):1 
  • Mixed population, primarily arthritis, at low-moderate CV risk (i.e. CV event rate ~1% per year). 
  • COX-2 inhibitors, compared to placebo, increased: 
    • All-cause mortality, Rate Ratio (RR) 1.22 (95% Confidence Interval 1.041.44). 
    • Major CV events, RR 1.37 (1.141.66). 
  • Diclofenac (150 mg/day)similar risks to COX-2s for mortality [RR 1.02 (0.84–1.24)] and CV events [RR 0.97 (0.84–1.12)]. 
    • Indirectly, diclofenac significantly increases CV events [RR 1.41 (1.12–1.78)] but not mortality [RR 1.20 (0.94–1.54)] compared to placebo. 
  • Naproxen (1000 mg/day) has less CV events and mortality than COX-2 inhibitors and may be similar to placebo. 
  • Relative risk similar between patients with or without prior CV disease. 
Two large RCTs showed similar risk of CV events between celecoxib and NSAIDs:
  • 7,297 patients with arthritis with no prior CV disease followed for three years:2 3.4% in both groups
  • 24,081 patients with arthritis with low-moderate CV risk followed for 2.8 years:3 Celecoxib 2.3% ibuprofen 2.7%, naproxen 2.5%.
  • However, several limitations challenge "non-inferiority" of celecoxib: Wide non-inferiority  margin (up to 40% higher CV risk),2,3 different conclusions based on analysis used,2 enrolled a lower-risk population than planned,2,3 comparison of non-equipotent doses with lower efficacy with celecoxib,2,3 high discontinuation and loss-to-follow-up,3 and others.4
Meta-analysis of observational trials:5
  • All COX-2s and NSAIDs, except naproxen and low-dose ibuprofen (≤1200 mg/day), increase CV risk.   
  • Risk increases with increasing NSAID dose.  
 

CONTEXT
CONTEXTE
  • In Canada, naproxen (28%), celecoxib (21%), and diclofenac (17%) account for the majority of NSAIDs prescribed.6 
  • The magnitude of the CV risk with high-risk NSAIDs is similar to the magnitude of the CV benefit with statin therapy. Choosing high-risk NSAIDs (taken daily) can cause one additional CV event over five years in:1 
    • ~10low-risk patients (baseline 5% ten-year CV risk). 
    • ~25 high-risk patients (baseline 20% ten-year CV risk). 
  • Generally, NSAIDs with relatively lower CV risks (naproxen) have relatively higher GI complication risks (ulcers and bleeds) and vice versa (coxibs).7 
    • Adding a proton pump inhibitor to a non-selective NSAID results in similar GI complication risks as COX-2s.8 
  • All NSAIDs increase risk of heart failure.1  


peter entwistle October 24, 2024

should be a standard contra-indication in our EMRs


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#379 Bumpin’ Up the Protection? RSV Vaccine in Pregnancy

How effective and safe is the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine (AbrysvoTM) when given during pregnancy?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#378 Tony Romo-sozumab: Winning touchdown in osteoporosis or interception for the loss?

What is the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#377 How to slow the flow IV: Combined oral contraceptives

In premenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding due to benign etiology, do combined oral contraceptives (COC) improve patient outcomes?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • G. Michael Allan MD CCFP
  • Megan Harbin BScPharm ACPR
  • Michael R Kolber BSc MD CCFP MSc
  • Ricky D. Turgeon BSc(Pharm) ACPR PharmD

1. Coxib and traditional NSAID Trialists’ (CNT) Collaboration. Lancet. 2013; 382(9894):769–79.

2. MacDonald TM, Hawkey CJ, Ford I, et al. Eur Heart J. 2016; 23:1843-50.

3. Nissen SE, Yeomans ND, Solomon DH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 2519-29.

4. Antman EM. Circulation. 2017; 135;2062-72.

5. McGettigan P, Henry D. PLoS Med. 2011; 8(9):1–18.

6. McGettigan P, Henry D. PLoS Med. 2013; 10(2):1–6.

7. Castellsague J, Riera-Guardia N, Calingaert, et al. Drug Saf. 2012; 35(12):1127–46.

8. Wang X, Tian HJ, Yang HK, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 23:876–80.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.

Most recent review: 28/01/2018

By: RIcky D Turgeon BSc(Pharm) ACPR PharmD, G Michael Allan MD CCFP

Comments:

Evidence reviewed: January 28, 2018. Evidence updated with two new large RCTs. Bottom line: small change.

Learning at a glance
Yearly credits
Acquired ()
Your content by topic
Cardiology Dermatology Emergency
My Bookmarks