Credits Earned (2024) Crédits obtenus

Redeem Prepaid Membership

Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#17 X-rays for Non-specific Low Back Pain: A non-specific pain?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
In patients with lower back pain, do lumbar X-rays modify any patient outcome?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
In non-specific low back pain, X-rays do nothing to improve outcomes and may worsen some (such as pain).



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
A recent meta-analysis, and a closer look at the best randomized controlled trial (RCT), help us here. 
  • Meta-analysis1: 6 trials (1804 patients): MRI/CT 2 trials & X-ray 4 trials.  0-44% had sciatica 
    • Relatively good quality but lots of heterogeneity (except pain). 
    • Short term & long-term outcomes of pain, function, quality of life, mental health and patient satisfaction did not differ significantly 
      • Pain at 3 months borderline worse with x-ray (Standard Mean Difference 0.19, CI -0.01 to 0.39) 
  • RCT,2 UK, 421 general practice patients with low-back pain ≥ 6 weeks  
    • At 3 months statistically significant difference in: 
      • Proportion of patients still in pain: 74% X-ray vs 65%, Number needed to harm (NNH) 12 
      • Proportion of patients requiring follow-up doctor visit: 53% X-ray vs 30%, NNH 5 
      • Self rated health status: 5% worse in X-ray group.   
  • After 6 more months, borderline but not statistically significant 
  • However, ≥ 80% of both groups want X-rays.  
    • Those with x-rays were more satisfied with the visit    
    • X-rays findings did not correlate to clinical findings
Context 
  • Early MRI and CT also do not improve outcomes.1 
  • A RCT comparing MRI directly to back X-ray also found no difference.3   
  • Three guidelines from Alberta4, Europe5 and US6 all discourage routine back x-rays for non-specific low back pain. 
  • Non-specific low back pain is low back pain without recognizable or known specific pathology (e.g. infection, tumour, osteoporosis, ankylosing spondylitis, fracture, inflammatory process, radicular syndrome or cauda equina syndrome).4-6  
  • These study results/recommendations do not apply to back pain with suspicion of specific pathology (such as progressive neurologic changes or infection) 
  • These patients warrant further investigation 
updated july 13, 2016 by ricky


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#378 Tony Romo-sozumab: Winning touchdown in osteoporosis or interception for the loss?

What is the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#377 How to slow the flow IV: Combined oral contraceptives

In premenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding due to benign etiology, do combined oral contraceptives (COC) improve patient outcomes?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#376 Testosterone supplementation for cis-gender men: Let’s (andro-)pause for a moment (Update)

What are the benefits and harms of testosterone supplementation in healthy cis-gender men or those with age-related low testosterone?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • G. Michael Allan MD CCFP
  • G. Richard Spooner MD CCFP

1. Chou R, Fu R, Carrino JA, et al. Lancet 2009; 373: 463–72.

2. Kendrick D, Fielding K, Bentley E, et al. BMJ. 2001 Feb 17;322:400-5.

3. Jarvik JG, Hollingworth W, Martin B, et al. JAMA 2003;289:2810–8.

4. http://www.topalbertadoctors.org/cpgs/885801. Accessed 27-AUG-2013.

5. http://www.kovacs.org/descargas/EuropeanGuidelinesfortheManagementofAcute NonspecificLowBackPain(54paginas).pdf Accessed 27-AUG-2013.

6. Chou R, Qaseen A, Snow V, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:478-491.

7. Chou R, Qaseem A, Owens DK, et al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:181-9.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.

Most recent review: 13/07/2016

By: Ricky D Turgeon BSc(Pharm) ACPR PharmD

Comments:

Evidence Updated: No new evidence; Bottom Line: No change.

Learning at a glance
Yearly credits
Acquired ()
Your content by topic
Cardiology Dermatology Emergency
My Bookmarks