Credits Earned (2024) Crédits obtenus

Redeem Prepaid Membership

Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#19 Vitamin B12 Deficiency: Monthly shots or daily pills?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
In patients with Vitamin B12 deficiency, is oral Vitamin B12 as effective as intramuscular (IM) Vitamin B12?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Oral Vitamin B12 is as effective as IM in most B12 deficient patients.  A dose of 1000 mcg (1 mg) a day orally appears adequate and most commonly recommended. 



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
A Cochrane Review1 summarizes two randomized control trials (RCTs):2,3  
  • The first study2 randomized 38 outpatients to daily oral B12 at 2000 mcg/day or IM B12 1000 mcg at days 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90.  
  • The second study3 randomized 70 patients to 1000 mcg B12 oral or IM: Daily for 10 days, then weekly for one month and then monthly for three months.   
  • Over 3-4 months of follow-up, both trials showed oral B12 as effective as IM therapy1 in:  
    • B12 levels and associated biochemical B12 markers (total homocysteine and serum methylmalonic acid) 
    • Hematological and neurological responses.   
  • A trial published since the meta-analysis also found similar efficacy between a novel B12 formulation and IM for B12 levels.4 
  • All trials had important limitations: Small,2-4 short,2-4 unblinded,2-4 and lack of intention to treat analysis,2,3 and/or written/funded by the manufacturer.4  
Context:   
  • 5-20% of elderly patients are B12 deficient.5 
  • The majority of Canadian physicians use IM B12 in treating deficiency.6 
  • Switching from IM to oral B12 would reduce health care costs as well as the discomfort and inconvenience of intramuscular injections.7  
  • Oral B12 appears effective over a range of causes of B12 deficiency (dietary, pernicious anemia, gastric or ileal surgery, malabsorption syndromes) studied.2,3,8,9    
  • Celiac Disease and Inflammatory Bowel Disease are not well studied. 
  • Due to limitations in the evidence, patients switched to oral should likely have their B12 levels checked to confirm they are not declining.10   
  • Dosing recommendation varied between included RCTs, so a simple recommendation is difficult;2,3    
  • A well designed Canadian cohort study demonstrated that 1 mg/day is effective.8  
  • However, first two RCTs used frequency over time so dosing frequency can be reduced with monitoring, if levels are normal and stable.   
updated nov 19 2017 by ricky


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#378 Tony Romo-sozumab: Winning touchdown in osteoporosis or interception for the loss?

What is the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#377 How to slow the flow IV: Combined oral contraceptives

In premenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding due to benign etiology, do combined oral contraceptives (COC) improve patient outcomes?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#376 Testosterone supplementation for cis-gender men: Let’s (andro-)pause for a moment (Update)

What are the benefits and harms of testosterone supplementation in healthy cis-gender men or those with age-related low testosterone?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • G. Michael Allan MD CCFP
  • Michael R Kolber MD CCFP MSc

1. Vidal-Alaball J, Butler C, Cannings-John R, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(1):004655.

2. Kuzminski AM, Del Giacco EJ, Allen RH, et al. Blood. 1998; 92:1191-8.

3. Bolaman Z, Kadikoylu G, Yukselen V, et al. Clin Ther. 2003; 25(12):3124-34.

4. Castelli NC, Friedman K, Sherry J, et al. Clin Ther. 2011; 33(3):358-71

5. Park S, Johnson MA. Nutr Rev. 2006; 64(8):373-378.

6. Graham ID, Jette N, Tetroe J, et al. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2007; 44(1):49-59.

7. van Walraven C, Austin P, Naylor CD. Can Fam Physician. 2001; 47:79-86.

8. Nyholm E, Turpin P, Swain D, et al. Postgrad Med J. 2003; 79:218-20.

9. Nyholm E, Turpin P, Swain D, et al. Postgrad Med J. 2003; 79:218-20.

10. Nyholm E, Turpin P, Swain D, et al. Postgrad Med J. 2003; 79:218-20.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.

Most recent review: 19/11/2017

By: Ricky D Turgeon BSc(Pharm) ACPR PharmD

Comments:

Evidence Updated: No change (RCT added in 2013 update); Bottom Line: No change.

Learning at a glance
Yearly credits
Acquired ()
Your content by topic
Cardiology Dermatology Emergency
My Bookmarks