Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#252 Electronic Cigarettes – Hoot that helps, hurts, or just hype?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
Do electronic cigarettes help smokers quit smoking?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
 Compared to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) or placebo electronic cigarettes, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrate that nicotine electronic cigarettes (NEC) aid in smoking cessation [number needed to treat (NNT)=13, 15]. Two other RCTs found no difference in cessation rates. Serious lung disease and deaths have been reported with electronic cigarettes (e-cigarette) use. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and vitamin E acetate containing e-cigarettes should be avoided.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
Focusing on larger (>200 patients) RCTs of ≥4 weeks duration with objective documentation of abstinence.1-4Three of four trials1,3,4 industry supported. Typical patient: ~40 years old, smoking ~0.75-1 pack/day for ~20-25 years. Continuous abstinence reported below. 
  • Smokers motivated to quit: 
    • 657 randomized to NEC, nicotine patch, or placebo electronic cigarettes (PEC).16-month abstinence:
      • NEC 7%, patch 6%, PEC 4% (not statistically different). 
    • 886 randomized to NEC or any other type of NRT.2 12-month abstinence: 
      • NEC 18%, NRT 10%, NNT=13. 
  • Smokers not intending to quit: 
    • 300 randomized to NEC, tapering doses of NEC, or PEC.3 12-month abstinence (NEC and tapered NEC combined): 
      • NEC 11%, PEC 4%, NNT=15. 
    • 1191 American company workers who responded to email invitations to participate in a smoking cessation trial were randomized to interventions below.4All received cessation information. 6-month abstinence: 
      • Cessation information only: 0.7%. 
      • Cessation aids (NRT/cessation medications): 3% (not statistically different). 
      • NEC: 5% (not statistically different). 
      • Adding monetary rewards or redeemable deposits: 10% and 13%, respectively. 
  • Adverse effects inconsistently reported in RCTs: throat/mouth irritation reported.2 
Context: 
  • E-cigarettes are commonly used cessation aids.5 
  • While long-term safety data are emerging, cases of e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI), including 48 deaths in the United States, have been reported.6 
    • THC-containing products were associated with 80% of reported hospitalized EVALI patients.6 
      • Vitamin E Acetate: might be the toxicant in THC related EVALI cases.7,8 
  • CDC recommends against the use of THC-containing vaping products.6 
  • Survey data suggests that e-cigarette use may be an independent risk factor for developing respiratory disease (COPD, asthma).9 
  • Regulations should limit adolescent/young adult exposure to e-cigarettes. 


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#363 Making a difference in indifference? Medications for apathy in dementia

In patients with dementia, how safe and effective are stimulants, antidepressants, and antipsychotics for treating apathy?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#362 Facing the Evidence in Acne, Part I: Oral contraceptives and spironolactone in females

How effective are combined oral contraceptives (COC) and spironolactone for treating acne of at least mild-moderate severity in females?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#361 Preventing RSV Infections in Infants

How safe and effective are monoclonal antibodies to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections in infants?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Tat Wong
  • Michael R Kolber MD CCFP MSc

1. Bullen C, Howe C, Laugensen M, et al. Lancet. 2014; 382(9905):1629-37.

2. Hajek P, Phillips-Waller A, Przulj D, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(7):629-37.

3. Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Cibella F, et al. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e66317.

4. Halpern S, Harhay M, Saulsgiver K, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(24):2302-10.

5. Rodu B, Plurphanswat N. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(11):E1403.

6. Lozier MJ, Wallace B, Anderson K, et al. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2019; 68(49):1142-48.

7. Blount BC, Karwowski MP, Morel-Espinosa M, et al. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2019; 68(45):1040-41.

8. Landman ST, Dhaliwal I, Mackenzie CA, et al. CMAJ 2019 December 2;191:E1321-31.

9. Bhatta DN, Glantz SA. Am J Prev Med 2019 Dec 11 [epub ahead of print].

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Les auteurs n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à déclarer.