#255 Exercise for osteoarthritis pain: how strong is the evidence?
Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits
Join NowAlready a CFPCLearn Member? Log in
- Systematic review (11 RCTs), 1367 participants.1 RCTs included various types of exercise programs (examples Tai Chi, aquatic/hydrotherapy, and muscle strengthening programs); the majority (91%) involved physiotherapy. After 6-104 weeks:
- Proportion achieving a meaningful pain response (~30% improvement on pain scale):
- 47% versus 21% (control), number needed to treat (NNT)=4.
- Proportion achieving a meaningful pain response (~30% improvement on pain scale):
- Three systematic reviews (9-54 RCTs), 549-2991 participants:2-4
- Mean improvement on pain scale:
- Pain: “small effect” based on standard mean difference=0.33-0.49.
- Function: “small to moderate effect” based on standard mean difference=0.27-0.52.
- Mean improvement on pain scale:
- Systematic review (103 RCTs), 9134 participants.5 Relative efficacy of different types of exercises:
- All types demonstrated significant benefit on pain compared to usual care.
- No significant difference between types (except “mixed exercise”, which included various types of exercise, and was less effective).
- Function: similar improvements as seen with pain.
- Guidelines recommend exercise such as walking, strengthening, neuromuscular training and aquatic exercise for osteoarthritis management. Type of exercise is based on patient preference and accessibility.6,7
- Similar efficacy seen regardless of osteoarthritis severity.8
- Participants in control groups of RCTs who receive any intervention (usual care or education) achieve greater improvement in pain compared to those assigned to wait-list or no intervention.1
- Qualitative data suggests that people are confused about the cause of their pain and its variability and do not know what they can safely do. Providing reassurance and clear advice may encourage greater exercise participation.4