#260 Are there tools to help assess dyspnea virtually?

CLINICAL QUESTION

QUESTION CLINIQUE

Are there any techniques (like the Roth Score) to augment a typical history when assessing dyspnea/pneumonia over the phone or by video?

BOTTOM LINE

RÉSULTAT FINAL

Unfortunately, no specific technique, including the Roth Score, is reliable in assuring dyspneic patients are not at risk and safe to stay home. Furthermore, no studies have evaluated dyspnea assessment in COVID-19 patients. Clinicians are encouraged to use available tools (https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1182/infographic) and have patients assessed in-person if there are any concerns.

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session

EVIDENCE

DONNÉES PROBANTES

1) Roth Score for virtual (phone/video) assessment of dyspnea.¹ Patients count upward from “1” as quickly as possible after a single deep breath. Can repeat after 3 deep breaths. Measure highest number attained and time (seconds) to highest number. Only one study:

103 healthy people (mean age 56). In one breath:
- 100% counted to ≥15.
- 94% counted to ≥20.
93 patients with dyspnea (mean age 76) admitted to internal medicine or cardiac intensive care (conditions like heart failure and pneumonia). Roth Score compared to pulse oximetry on room air:
- Area-under-the-curve (assesses overall test utility):
  - Predicted <95% O2 pulse oximetry: 0.83 (pretty good).
  - Predicting <90% O2 pulse oximetry: 0.84 (pretty good).
- Sensitivity and specificity appear to be presented incorrectly. It is impossible to determine predictive cut-offs for helping make or exclude diagnosis.
  - [We emailed the authors twice without response.]

2) Clinical features of pneumonia: Systematic review of 13 diagnostic studies (outpatient or emergency departments) with 11,144 patients:²

Small-moderate help making the diagnosis of pneumonia (Likelihood Ratio ~3.5):
- Respiratory rate ≥20/minute or fever ≥38°C.
No individual clinical features helpful in excluding pneumonia.

3) Patient self-rating of dyspnea on numerical rating scale (0-10, higher=worse).

253 emergency patients (mean age 61) with complaint of dyspnea.³
- Correlated quite well with respiratory rate (r=0.77) and okay with oxygen saturation (r=0.43).
In 188 chronic COPD patients, did not correlate with oxygen saturation.⁴

Context:

Dyspnea encompasses more than oxygen saturation and has no gold standard for assessment.⁵
None of these studies assessed patients with COVID-19 which may have distinct clinical characteristics.
BMJ provides a helpful resource for assessment of COVID-19 patients virtually [https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1182/infographic].⁶