#264 From theory to reality: ACEi, ARB, and COVID-19
Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits
Join NowAlready a CFPCLearn Member? Log in
- No evidence presented.
- 3 retrospective cohort studies:
- 8910 hospitalized COVID-19 positive patients on international registry, 17% from North America, mean age 49.2
- In-hospital death:
- 2.1% ACEi versus 6.1% no ACEi (statistically different).
- 6.8% ARB versus 5.7% no ARB (not statistically different).
- In-hospital death:
- 12594 patients (5894 COVID-19 positive) in New York City.3
- ACEi/ARB use had no association with:
- Positive COVID-19 test (58% versus 57%).
- ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, or death (25% both groups).
- ACEi/ARB use had no association with:
- 18472 patients (1735 COVID-19 positive) in Ohio and Florida, mean age 49.4
- Positive COVID-19 test: No difference (9% both groups).
- Hospitalization: 53% ACEi/ARB versus 36% no ACEi/ARB (statistically different).
- ICU admission: 22% ACEi/ARB versus 15% no ACEi/ARB (statistically different).
- ARB alone not statistically different from control.
- Mechanical ventilation: 14% ACEi/ARB versus 11% no ACEi/ARB (not statistically different).
- 8910 hospitalized COVID-19 positive patients on international registry, 17% from North America, mean age 49.2
- 2 case-control studies:
- 37031 people (6272 COVID-19 patients) in Lombardy, Italy; mean age 68.5
- No association between ACEi/ARB and risk of COVID-19 infection, or risk of severe COVID-19 disease or death.
- 12529 patients (1139 COVID-19 positive) in Madrid, Spain, mean age 69.6
- ACEi/ARB use not associated with risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 disease versus other hypertensive drugs.
- 37031 people (6272 COVID-19 patients) in Lombardy, Italy; mean age 68.5
- Various professional societies recommend continuing ACEi/ARB where clearly indicated.7
- Observational studies investigate associations and do not demonstrate causation.
Acei/ARB do increase risk of COVID