Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#353 – Turn Down the Heat! Can non-hormonal drugs improve vasomotor symptoms in menopause?


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
Do non-hormonal medications improve menopausal vasomotor symptoms?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
After 12 weeks, approximately 50-75% of women with menopausal vasomotor symptoms experience ≥50% decrease in hot flashes with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) or gabapentin versus 35-60% on placebo. Placebo reduces the number of hot flashes by about 40-50%, with an additional 10-20% reduction from SSRIs, SNRIs, and gabapentin.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
  • All results statistically different unless indicated.
  • SSRIs (six meta-analyses, 4-11 RCTs, 547-2069 patients);1-6 SNRIs (five meta-analyses, 2-7 RCTs, 301-3685 patients);2-3,5,7-8 gabapentin (five meta-analyses, 2-9 RCTs, 901-3519 patients);2,3,9-11 clonidine (one meta-analysis, 4 RCTs, 30-198 patients).3 When outcomes not available, largest RCTs for each drug class retrieved.
    • Hot flashes (daily):
      • SSRIs,1 gabapentin,desvenlafaxine:12-13 Baseline 9-11;
        • Mean difference: 1-2 fewer hot flashes over placebo at 4-12 weeks.
        • Example: 3-4 hot flashes (desvenlafaxine) versus 5-6 (placebo).12
      • Oxybutynin (148 patients):14 Four fewer hot flashes over placebo.
      • Clonidine:One fewer hot flash over placebo.
        • No difference when breast cancer patients excluded.
    • Proportion with ≥50% reduction in number of hot flashes. Examples at 12 weeks, (unless noted):
      • Gabapentin15 (600 patients): 73% versus 60% (placebo), number needed to treat (NNT)=8.
      • Desvenlafaxine12 (567 patients): 68-75% versus 48% (placebo), NNT=4-5.
      • SSRIs:
        • Paroxetine16 (614 patients) or escitalopram17 (205 patients): 48-55% versus 36% (placebo), NNT=6-9 over 8-12 weeks.
        • Fluoxetine, citalopram (150 patients):18 No difference versus placebo.
    • Global assessment: “Much/Very much improved” over 12 weeks:
      • Gabapentin:15 58% versus 44% (placebo), NNT=8.
      • Oxybutynin:14 73% versus 26% (placebo), NNT=2.
    • Quality of life: Versus placebo:
      • Citalopram, fluoxetine, or sertraline:18-19 No difference.
      • Escitalopram:20 Not clinically different.
  • Limitations: Event rates not reported;2-8,10-11 standard mean differences used (difficult to interpret clinically);1,2,8,10-11 breast cancer patients included;2,3,6,9-11 RCTs industry funded.13-16,18-19

CONTEXT
CONTEXTE
  • Guidelines:
    • First-line: Hormone therapy; second-line: SSRIs, SNRIs, or gabapentin.21
  • Hormone therapy:
    • Versus placebo: ~18 fewer hot flashes/week (mostly estradiol 1-2mg).22
    • Versus gabapentin: 1 fewer hot flash/day with hormone therapy.10
    • Versus venlafaxine: RCT underpowered to compare agents for efficacy outcomes.23
      • Patient satisfaction: 70% versus 51% venlafaxine.
  • Dosing (daily):21 Paroxetine 10-25mg, desvenlafaxine 100-150mg, gabapentin 900-2400mg.


Waguih Tannous November 27, 2023

Interesting but not conclusive results.

Dubravka Rakic November 28, 2023

None

Luc Chagnon November 30, 2023

HRT should be gold standard , we should stop to have concern about HRT with bioidentical drugs

DATONYE DOUGLAS December 10, 2023

Excellent study material

Sayema Parveen December 11, 2023

i do use venlafaxine in my practice with good results

Nonyelum Agomo December 12, 2023

Alternatives to HRT are always welcome

James Livingstone February 5, 2024

Given a 50% respone rate to placebo therapy, it seems reasonable to start with such therapy for those
patients who inclined to more natural products as first ;ine therapy.

Lionel Martinez June 21, 2024

Interesting to see how HRT is still prominent but there is still such hesitation to taking it

Domino Chaulk October 27, 2024

These are all goo options .they can all be used and should be given to our patients as options after a discussion with them


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#378 Tony Romo-sozumab: Winning touchdown in osteoporosis or interception for the loss?

What is the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#377 How to slow the flow IV: Combined oral contraceptives

In premenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding due to benign etiology, do combined oral contraceptives (COC) improve patient outcomes?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#376 Testosterone supplementation for cis-gender men: Let’s (andro-)pause for a moment (Update)

What are the benefits and harms of testosterone supplementation in healthy cis-gender men or those with age-related low testosterone?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Ashley Domingues PharmD Candidate
  • Émélie Braschi MD PhD
  • Samantha S. Moe PharmD

1. Shams T, Firwana B, Habib F, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2014; 29(1):204-213.

2. Cheng Y, Tseng P, Wu M, et al. Sleep Med Rev. 2021; 57:101469.

3. Nelson H, Kimberly Vesco M, Haney E, et al. JAMA. 2006; 295(17):2057-2071.

4. Riemma G, Schiattarella A, La Verde M, et al. Medicina. 2019; 55(9):554.

5. Sarri G, Pedder H, Dias S, et al. BJOG. 2017; 124(10):1514-1523.

6. Wei D, Chen Y, Wu C, et al. BJOG. 2016; 123(11):1735-1743.

7. Berhan Y, Berhan A. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014; 24(3):209-218.

8. Sun Z, Hao Y, Zhang M. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013; 75(4):255-262.

9. Toulis K, Tzellos T, Kouvelas D, et al. Clin Ther. 2009; 31(2):221-235.

10. Shan D, Zou L, Liu X, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222(6):564-579.

11. Yoon S, Lee J, Lee C, et al. Menopause. 2020; 27(4):485-493.

12. Archer D, Dupont C, Constantine G, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200(3):238.e1-238.e10.

13. Speroff L, Gass M, Constantine G et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111(1):77-87.

14. Simon J, Gaines T, LaGuardia K, et al. Menopause. 2016; 23(11):1214-1221.

15. Pinkerton JV, Kagan R, Portman D, et al. Menopause. 2014; 21(6):567-73.

16. Simon JA, Portman DJ, Kaunitz AM, et al. Menopause. 2013; 20(10):1027-35.

17. Freeman EW, Guthrie KA, Caan B, et al. JAMA. 2011; 305(3): 267-74.

18. Suvanto-Luukkonen E, Koivunen R, Undstrom H, et al. Menopause. 2005; 12(1): 18-26.

19. Gordon PR, Kerwin JP, Boesen KG, et al. Menopause. 2006; 13(4): 568-75.

20. LaCroix AZ, Freeman EW, Larson J, et al. Maturitas. 2012; 73(4): 361-8.

21. The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2023; 30(6):573-590.

22. MacLennan AH, Broadbent JL, Lester S, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; Issue 4,Art. No: CD002978.

23. Joffe H, Guthrie KA, LaCroix AZ, et al. JAMA. Intern Med 2014; 174(7): 1058-66.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare