Tools for Practice Outils pour la pratique


#363 Making a difference in indifference? Medications for apathy in dementia


CLINICAL QUESTION
QUESTION CLINIQUE
In patients with dementia, how safe and effective are stimulants, antidepressants, and antipsychotics for treating apathy?


BOTTOM LINE
RÉSULTAT FINAL
Methylphenidate may improve apathy scores by a small but potentially clinically meaningful amount compared to placebo (example: 5 points more on a 72-point scale) at ~12 weeks. Methylphenidate does not impact cognition in randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). Antipsychotics and antidepressants do not improve apathy compared to placebo.



CFPCLearn Logo

Reading Tools for Practice Article can earn you MainPro+ Credits

La lecture d'articles d'outils de pratique peut vous permettre de gagner des crédits MainPro+

Join Now S’inscrire maintenant

Already a CFPCLearn Member? Log in

Déjà abonné à CMFCApprendre? Ouvrir une session



EVIDENCE
DONNÉES PROBANTES
  • Results statistically different unless indicated. Comparisons versus placebo.
  • Two systematic reviews (4-7 RCTs, 346-1341 patients) from the last 5 years of treating apathy in mild-moderate Alzheimer’s dementia over 2-24 weeks.1,2
  • Methylphenidate (immediate-release 10mg BID). Reporting most inclusive systematic review (4 RCTs, 346 patients):2
    • Apathy (mix of informant- and clinician-rated)
      • 72-point apathy scale (Baseline ~50; 3.3-point change clinically significant).3-6
        • 6 point improvement versus 1 point (placebo) at ≤12 weeks.2
      • 12-point apathy scale (Baseline ~7; 1-2 point change clinically significant).2,3,5,7
        • No difference versus placebo at <12 weeks.2
        • 4.5 point improvement versus 3.1 (placebo) at 24 weeks.2
    • Clinicians’ global impression:
      • Any improvement: 46% versus 34% (placebo).2
    • Mini-mental state exam:
      • No difference.2
    • Any adverse events or dropouts due to adverse events:
      • No difference.2
  • Antipsychotics (2 RCTs, 421-649 patients):1
    • Apathy: No difference.
  • Antidepressants:
    • SSRIs (2 RCTs, 43-83 patients, neither required apathy diagnosis):1
      • Apathy: Inconsistent results.8,9
    • Bupropion (One RCT not in systematic reviews, 108 patients) versus placebo:10
      • Apathy: No difference.
      • Quality of Life (52-point scale): 1.2 points worse versus 0.4 better (placebo).
  • Limitations: Small studies; one cross-over RCT (26 patients) negatively skewed meta-analyzed results;5 apathy a secondary outcome in antidepressant and antipsychotic RCTs; trial exclusion criteria (examples: cardiac abnormalities, uncontrolled hypertension, agitation) limit generalizability and safety data.

CONTEXT
CONTEXTE
  • No improvement in apathy with cholinesterase inhibitors alone versus placebo,2 but 60-100% of RCT methylphenidate patients used cholinesterase inhibitors.1,2
  • Methylphenidate associated with weight loss, behavioural changes, insomnia, and cardiovascular harms.11
  • Depression and apathy often overlap and can be difficult to distinguish in practice.12
  • Non-pharmacologic options include sensory stimulation (example music therapy) and pet therapy based on low-quality evidence of benefit.13


Elionora sofronova April 19, 2024

thank you for the info, helpful

David Reesor April 24, 2024

Frustratingly poor results.


Latest Tools for Practice
Derniers outils pour la pratique

#364 Facing the Evidence in Acne, Part II: Oral Antibiotics

How effective are oral antibiotics in treating acne of at least mild-moderate severity?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#363 Making a difference in indifference? Medications for apathy in dementia

In patients with dementia, how safe and effective are stimulants, antidepressants, and antipsychotics for treating apathy?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

#362 Facing the Evidence in Acne, Part I: Oral contraceptives and spironolactone in females

How effective are combined oral contraceptives (COC) and spironolactone for treating acne of at least mild-moderate severity in females?
Read Lire 0.25 credits available Crédits disponibles

This content is certified for MainPro+ Credits, log in to access

Ce contenu est certifié pour les crédits MainPro+, Ouvrir une session


Author(s)
Auteur(s)
  • Wyatt Baloun PharmD candidate
  • Bradley LeDrew PharmD candidate
  • Jen Potter MD CCFP
  • Jamie Falk PharmD

1. Dean RL, Ruthirakuhan M, Herrmann N, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May; 5(5):CD012197.

2. Lee C, Chen J, Ko C, et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Dec; 239(12):3743-3753. Epub 2022 Oct 15.

3. Rosenberg P, Lanctôt K, Drye L, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Aug; 74(8):810-6.

4. Padala PR, Padala KP, Lensing SY, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2018; 175:159–168.

5. Herrmann N, Rothenburg LS, Black SE, et al. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008; 28(3):296-301.

6. Lanctôt K, Chau S, Herrmann N, et al. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Feb; 26(2):239–246. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

7. Mintzer J, Lanctôt K,.Scherer RW, et al. JAMA Neurol. 2021; 78(11):1324-1332.

8. Lanctôt KL, Herrmann N, Van Reekum R, et al. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002; 17(6):531-41.

9. Leonpacher AK, Peters ME, Drye LT, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2016; 173(5):473-80.

10. Maier F, Spottke A, Bach J, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May; 1;3(5):e206027.

11. Sassi KLM, Rocha NP, Colpo GD, et al. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020; 18(2):126-135.

12. Brodaty H, Connors MH. Alzheimers Dement. 2020; 12:e12027.

13. Cai Y, Li L, Xu C, et al. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Aug; 17(4):311-318.

Authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.